Pegylated liposomes for delivery of immunogen encoding rna

ABSTRACT

Nucleic acid immunisation is achieved by delivering RNA encapsulated within a PEGylated liposome. The RNA encodes an immunogen of interest. The PEG has an average molecular mass of between 1 kDa and 3 kDa. Thus the invention provides a liposome having a lipid bilayer encapsulating an aqueous core, wherein: (i) the lipid bilayer comprises at least one lipid which includes a polyethylene glycol moiety, such that polyethylene glycol is present on the liposome&#39;s exterior, wherein the average molecular mass of the polyethylene glycol is between 1 kDa and 3 kDa; and (ii) the aqueous core includes a RNA which encodes an immunogen. These liposomes are suitable for in vivo delivery of the RNA to a vertebrate cell and so they are useful as components in pharmaceutical compositions for immunising subjects against various diseases.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional applicationnumber 61/378,826, which was filed Aug. 31, 2010, the complete contentsof which are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention is in the field of non-viral delivery of RNA forimmunisation.

BACKGROUND ART

The delivery of nucleic acids for immunising animals has been a goal forseveral years. Various approaches have been tested, including the use ofDNA or RNA, of viral or non-viral delivery vehicles (or even no deliveryvehicle, in a “naked” vaccine), of replicating or non-replicatingvectors, or of viral or non-viral vectors.

There remains a need for further and improved nucleic acid vaccines and,in particular, for improved ways of delivering nucleic acid vaccines.

DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

According to the invention, nucleic acid immunisation is achieved bydelivering RNA encapsulated within a liposome. The RNA encodes animmunogen of interest. The liposome includes a PEGylated lipid i.e. thelipid is modified by covalent attachment of a polyethylene glycol. PEGprovides the liposomes with a coat which can confer favourablepharmacokinetic characteristics e.g. it can increase stability andprevent non-specific adsorption of the liposomes. The inventors havefound that the length of the PEG can affect in vivo expression ofencapsulated RNA and so the invention uses liposomes which comprise PEGwhich has an average molecular mass of between 1 kDa and 3 kDa. PEG witha lower molecular weight (e.g. 500 or 750 Da) does not form stableliposomes.

Thus the invention provides a liposome within which RNA encoding animmunogen of interest is encapsulated, wherein the liposome comprises atleast one lipid which includes a polyethylene glycol moiety, such thatpolyethylene glycol is present on the liposome's exterior, wherein theaverage molecular mass of the polyethylene glycol is between 1 kDa and 3kDa. These liposomes are suitable for in vivo delivery of the RNA to avertebrate cell and so they are useful as components in pharmaceuticalcompositions for immunising subjects against various diseases.

The invention also provides a process for preparing a RNA-containingliposome, comprising a step of mixing RNA with one or more lipids, underconditions such that the lipids form a liposome in which the RNA isencapsulated, wherein at least one lipid includes a polyethylene glycolmoiety which becomes located on the liposome's exterior during theprocess, and wherein the average molecular mass of the polyethyleneglycol is between 1 kDa and 3 kDa.

The liposome

The invention utilises liposomes within which immunogen-encoding RNA isencapsulated. Thus the RNA is (as in a natural virus) separated from anyexternal medium. Encapsulation within the liposome has been found toprotect RNA from RNase digestion. The liposomes can include someexternal RNA (e.g. on their surface), but at least half of the RNA (andideally all of it) is encapsulated in the liposome's core. Encapsulationwithin liposomes is distinct from, for instance, the lipid/RNA complexesdisclosed in reference 1, where RNA is mixed with pre-formed liposomes.

Various amphiphilic lipids can form bilayers in an aqueous environmentto encapsulate a RNA-containing aqueous core as a liposome. These lipidscan have an anionic, cationic or zwitterionic hydrophilic head group.Formation of liposomes from anionic phospholipids dates back to the1960s, and cationic liposome-forming lipids have been studied since the1990s. Some phospholipids are anionic whereas other are zwitterionic andothers are cationic. Suitable classes of phospholipid include, but arenot limited to, phosphatidylethanolamines, phosphatidylcholines,phosphatidylserines, and phosphatidyl-glycerols, and some usefulphospholipids are listed in Table 1. Useful cationic lipids include, butare not limited to, dioleoyl trimethylammonium propane (DOTAP),1,2-distearyloxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-aminopropane (DSDMA),1,2-dioleyloxy-N,Ndimethyl-3-aminopropane (DODMA),1,2-dilinoleyloxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-aminopropane (DLinDMA),1,2-dilinolenyloxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-aminopropane (DLenDMA). Zwitterioniclipids include, but are not limited to, acyl zwitterionic lipids andether zwitterionic lipids. Examples of useful zwitterionic lipids areDPPC, DOPC, DSPC, dodecylphosphocholine,1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), and1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPyPE). The lipids canbe saturated or unsaturated. The use of at least one unsaturated lipidfor preparing liposomes is preferred. If an unsaturated lipid has twotails, both tails can be unsaturated, or it can have one saturated tailand one unsaturated tail. A lipid can include a steroid group in onetail e.g. as in RV05.

Thus in one embodiment the invention provides a liposome having a lipidbilayer encapsulating an aqueous core, wherein: (i) the lipid bilayercomprises at least one lipid which includes a polyethylene glycolmoiety, such that polyethylene glycol is present on the liposome'sexterior, wherein the average molecular mass of the polyethylene glycolis between 1 kDa and 3 kDa; and (ii) the aqueous core includes a RNAwhich encodes an immunogen.

Liposomes of the invention can be formed from a single lipid or from amixture of lipids. A mixture may comprise (i) a mixture of anioniclipids (ii) a mixture of cationic lipids (iii) a mixture of zwitterioniclipids (iv) a mixture of anionic lipids and cationic lipids (v) amixture of anionic lipids and zwitterionic lipids (vi) a mixture ofzwitterionic lipids and cationic lipids or (vii) a mixture of anioniclipids, cationic lipids and zwitterionic lipids. Similarly, a mixturemay comprise both saturated and unsaturated lipids. For example, amixture may comprise DSPC (zwitterionic, saturated), DlinDMA (cationic,unsaturated), and/or DMG (anionic, saturated). Where a mixture of lipidsis used, not all of the component lipids in the mixture need to beamphiphilic e.g. one or more amphiphilic lipids can be mixed withcholesterol.

Where a liposome of the invention is formed from a mixture of lipids, itis preferred that the proportion of those lipids which are PEGylated asdescribed herein is less than 10% of the total amount of lipids e.g.between 0.5-5%, between 1-4%, or abbut 2%. For instance, usefulliposomes are shown below in which 2% of the total lipid is a PEG-DMG.The remainder can be made of e.g. cholesterol (e.g. 35-50% cholesterol)and/or cationic lipid (e.g. 30-70%) and/or DSPC (e.g. 5-15%). Suchmixtures are used below. These percentage values are mole percentages.

Thus a liposome can be formed from a cationic lipid (e.g. DlinDMA,RV05), a zwitterionic lipid (e.g. DSPC, DPyPE), a cholesterol, and aPEGylated lipid. A mixture of DSPC, DlinDMA, PEG-DMG and cholesterol isused in the examples, as well as several further mixtures.

At least one lipid within the liposome includes a polyethylene glycolmoiety. Liposomes which include these PEGylated lipids will have PEGoriented so that it is present on at least the exterior of the liposome(but some PEG may also be exposed to the liposome's interior i.e. to theaqueous core). This orientation can be achieved by attaching the PEG toan appropriate part of the lipid. For instance, in an amphiphilic lipidthe PEG would be attached to the hydrophilic head, as it is this headwhich orients itself to the lipid bilayer's aqueous-facing exterior.PEGylation in this way can be achieved by covalent attachment of a PEGto a lipid e.g. using techniques such as those disclosed in reference 2and 3.

Thus the PEGylated lipids will comprise the PEG structure:

where n provides a molecular weight for the PEG of between 1 kDa and 3kDa e.g. between 23 and 68, or about 45 for a 2 kDa PEGylation (e.g. seeFIG. 16).

The PEG moiety can terminate with an —O-methyl group, and so a PEGylatedlipid may comprise:

Including attachment to a nitrogen in a lipid's head group, therefore, aPEGylated lipid useful with the invention may comprise:

One suitable PEGylated lipid for use with the invention is PEG-DMG, asused in the examples. FIGS. 17A to 17E show further useful PEGylatedlipids. PEGylated cholesterol can also be used. Other PEGylated lipidscan be used e.g. lipids of Formula (X):

wherein:

Z is a hydrophilic head group component selected from PEG and polymersbased on poly(oxazoline), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol),poly(glycerol), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone),poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] and poly(amino acid)s, whereinthe polymer may be linear or branched, and wherein the polymer may beoptionally substituted;

Z is polymerized by n subunits;

n is a number-averaged degree of polymerization between 10 and 200 unitsof Z (and can be optimized for different Z groups);

L₁ is an optionally substituted C₁₋₁₀ alkylene or C₁₋₁₀ heteroalkylenelinker including zero, one or two of an ether (e.g., —C(O)O—), ester(e.g., —C(O)O—), succinate (e.g., —O(O)C—CH₂—CH₂—C(O)O—)), carbamate(e.g., —OC(O)—NR′—), carbonate (e.g., —OC(O)O—), urea (e.g.,—NRC(O)NR′—), amine (e.g., —NR′—), amide (e.g., —C(O)NR′—), imine (e.g.,—C(NR′)—), thioether (e.g., —S—), xanthate (e.g., —OC(S)S—), andphosphodiester (e.g., —OP(O)₂O—), wherein R′ is independently selectedfrom ‘3H, —NH—, —NH₂, —O—, —S—, a phosphate or an optionally substitutedC₁₋₁₀ alkylene;

X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from a carbon or a heteroatomselected from —NH—, —O—, —S— or a phosphate;

A₁ and A₂ are either independently selected from a C₆₋₃₀ alkyl, C₆-₃₀alkenyl, and C₆₋₃₀ alkynyl, wherein A₁ and A₂ may be the same ordifferent, or A₁ and A₂ together with the carbon atom to which they areattached form an optionally substituted steroid.

A liposome of the invention will typically include a large number of PEGmoieties, which may be the same or different. The average molecular massof the PEG in a liposome of the invention is between 1 kDa and 3 kDae.g. between 1.5-2.5 kDa, between 1.7-2.3 kDa, between 1.8-2.2 kDa,between 1.9-2.1 kDa, or 2 kDa. Thus the PEG can be a PEG which iscommonly known as “PEG 2000” or “PEG 2 k”, although the shorter “PEG1000” and longer “PEG 3000” can also be used.

The PEG will usually comprise linear polymer chains but, in someembodiments, the PEG may comprise branched polymer chains.

It is also possible for a single lipid molecule to include more than onePEG group e.g. attached to different carbon atoms in a lipid's headgroup (e.g. see FIG. 18). In these circumstances the reference to themolecular mass of PEG in a liposome is the molecular mass per lipidmolecule rather than per PEG substituent. Thus, in a liposome in whichthe sole PEGylated lipid has the structure shown in FIG. 18, where theboxed molecular weight is 2 kDa and is made up of two chains of 1 kDaeach, the average molecular mass of the PEG is 2 kDa not 1 kDa.

In some embodiments the PEG may be a substituted PEG e.g. in which oneor more carbon atoms in the polymer is substituted by one or more alkyl,alkoxy, acyl or aryl groups.

In some embodiments the PEG may include copolymer groups e.g. one ormore propylene monomers, to form a PEG polypropylene polymer.

As an alternative to PEGylation, a lipid may be modified by covalentattachment of a moiety different from PEG. For instance, in someembodiments a lipid may include a polyphosphazene. In some embodiments alipid may include a poly(vinyl pyrrolidone). In some embodiments a lipidmay include a poly(acryl amide); In some embodiments a lipid may includea poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline). In some embodiments a lipid may include apoly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline). In some embodiments a lipid may include aphosphatidyl polyglycerol. In some embodiments a lipid may include apoly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide]. In some embodiments a lipid mayinclude a polyalkylene ether polymer, other than PEG.

Liposomes are usually divided into three groups: multilamellar vesicles(MLV); small unilamellar vesicles (SUV); and large unilamellar vesicles(LUV). MLVs have multiple bilayers in each vesicle, forming severalseparate aqueous compartments. SUVs and LUVs have a single bilayerencapsulating an aqueous core; SUVs typically have a diameter ≦50 nm,and LUVs have a diameter >50 nm. Liposomes of the invention are ideallyLUVs with a diameter in the range of 60-180 nm, and preferably in therange of 80-160 nm.

A liposome of the invention can be part of a composition comprising aplurality of liposomes, and the liposomes within the plurality can havea range of diameters. For a composition comprising a population ofliposomes with different diameters: (i) at least 80% by number of theliposomes should have diameters in the range of 60-180 nm, andpreferably in the range of 80-160 nm, and/or (ii) the average diameter(by intensity e.g. Z-average) of the population is ideally in the rangeof 60-180 nm, and preferably in the range of 80-160 nm. The diameterswithin the plurality should ideally have a polydispersity index <0.2.The liposome/RNA complexes of reference 1 are expected to have adiameter in the range of 600-800 nm and to have a high polydispersity.

Techniques for preparing suitable liposomes are well known in the arte.g. see references 4 to 6. One useful method is described in reference7 and involves mixing (i) an ethanolic solution of the lipids (ii) anaqueous solution of the nucleic acid and (iii) buffer, followed bymixing, equilibration, dilution and purification. Preferred liposomes ofthe invention are obtainable by this mixing process.

To obtain liposomes with the desired diameter(s), mixing can beperformed using a process in which two feed streams of aqueous RNAsolution are combined in a single mixing zone with one stream of anethanolic lipid solution, all at the same flow rate e.g. in amicrofluidic channel as described below.

The RNA

Liposomes of the invention include a RNA molecule which (unlike siRNA,as in reference 2) encodes an immunogen. After in vivo administration ofthe particles, RNA is released from the particles and is translatedinside a cell to provide the immunogen in situ.

The RNA is +-stranded, and so it can be translated by cells withoutneeding any intervening replication steps such as reverse transcription.It can also bind to TLR7 receptors expressed by immune cells, therebyinitiating an adjuvant effect.

Preferred +-stranded RNAs are self-replicating. A self-replicating RNAmolecule (replicon) can, when delivered to a vertebrate cell evenwithout any proteins, lead to the production of multiple daughter RNAsby transcription from itself (via an antisense copy which it generatesfrom itself). A self-replicating RNA molecule is thus typically a+-strand molecule which can be directly translated after delivery to acell, and this translation provides a RNA-dependent RNA polymerase whichthen produces both antisense and sense transcripts from the deliveredRNA. Thus the delivered RNA leads to the production of multiple daughterRNAs. These daughter RNAs, as well as collinear subgenomic transcripts,may be translated themselves to provide in situ expression of an encodedimmunogen, or may be transcribed to provide further transcripts with thesame sense as the delivered RNA which are translated to provide in situexpression of the immunogen. The overall result of this sequence oftranscriptions is a huge amplification in the number of the introducedreplicon RNAs and so the encoded immunogen becomes a major polypeptideproduct of the cells.

One suitable system for achieving self-replication is to use analphavirus-based RNA replicon. These +-stranded replicons are translatedafter delivery to a cell to give of a replicase (orreplicase-transcriptase). The replicase is translated as a polyproteinwhich auto-cleaves to provide a replication complex which createsgenomic −strand copies of the +-strand delivered RNA. These −-strandtranscripts can themselves be transcribed to give further copies of the+-stranded parent RNA and also to give a subgenomic transcript whichencodes the immunogen. Translation of the subgenomic transcript thusleads to in situ expression of the immunogen by the infected cell.Suitable alphavirus replicons can use a replicase from a Sindbis virus,a Semliki forest virus, an eastern equine encephalitis virus, aVenezuelan equine encephalitis virus, etc. Mutant or wild-type virusessequences can be used e.g. the attenuated TC83 mutant of VEEV has beenused in replicons [8].

A preferred self-replicating RNA molecule thus encodes (i) aRNA-dependent RNA polymerase which can transcribe RNA from theself-replicating RNA molecule and (ii) an immunogen. The polymerase canbe an alphavirus replicase e.g. comprising one or more of alphavirusproteins nsP1, nsP2, nsP3 and nsP4.

Whereas natural alphavirus genomes encode structural virion proteins inaddition to the non-structural replicase polyprotein, it is preferredthat a self-replicating RNA molecule of the invention does not encodealphavirus structural proteins. Thus a preferred self-replicating RNAcan lead to the production of genomic RNA copies of itself in a cell,but not to the production of RNA-containing virions. The inability toproduce these virions means that, unlike a wild-type alphavirus, theself-replicating RNA molecule cannot perpetuate itself in infectiousform. The alphavirus structural proteins which are necessary forperpetuation in wild-type viruses are absent from self-replicating RNAsof the invention and their place is taken by gene(s) encoding theimmunogen of interest, such that the subgenomic transcript encodes theimmunogen rather than the structural alphavirus virion proteins.

Thus a self-replicating RNA molecule useful with the invention may havetwo open reading frames. The first (5′) open reading frame encodes areplicase; the second (3′) open reading frame encodes an immunogen. Insome embodiments the RNA may have additional (e.g. downstream) openreading frames e.g. to encode further immunogens (see below) or toencode accessory polypeptides.

A self-replicating RNA molecule can have a 5′ sequence which iscompatible with the encoded replicase.

Self-replicating RNA molecules can have various lengths but they aretypically 5000-25000 nucleotides long e.g. 8000-15000 nucleotides, or9000-12000 nucleotides. Thus the RNA is longer than seen in siRNAdelivery.

A RNA molecule useful with the invention may have a 5′ cap (e.g. a7-methylguanosine). This cap can enhance in vivo translation of the RNA.

The 5′ nucleotide of a RNA molecule useful with the invention may have a5′ triphosphate group. In a capped RNA this may be linked to a7-methylguanosine via a 5′-to-5′ bridge. A 5′ triphosphate can enhanceRIG-I binding and thus promote adjuvant effects.

A RNA molecule may have a 3′ poly-A tail. It may also include a poly-Apolymerase recognition sequence (e.g. AAUAAA) near its 3′ end.

A RNA molecule useful with the invention will typically besingle-stranded. Single-stranded RNAs can generally initiate an adjuvanteffect by binding to TLR7, TLR8, RNA helicases and/or PKR. RNA deliveredin double-stranded form (dsRNA) can bind to TLR3, and this receptor canalso be triggered by dsRNA which is formed either during replication ofa single-stranded RNA or within the secondary structure of asingle-stranded RNA.

A RNA molecule useful with the invention can conveniently be prepared byin vitro transcription (IVT). NT can use a (cDNA) template created andpropagated in plasmid form in bacteria, or created synthetically (forexample by gene synthesis and/or polymerase chain-reaction (PCR)engineering methods). For instance, a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (suchas the bacteriophage T7, T3 or SP6 RNA polymerases) can be used totranscribe the RNA from a DNA template. Appropriate capping and poly-Aaddition reactions can be used as required (although the replicon'spoly-A is usually encoded within the DNA template). These RNApolymerases can have stringent requirements for the transcribed 5′nucleotide(s) and in some embodiments these requirements must be matchedwith the requirements of the encoded replicase, to ensure that theIVT-transcribed RNA can function efficiently as a substrate for itsself-encoded replicase.

As discussed in reference 9, the self-replicating RNA can include (inaddition to any 5′ cap structure) one or more nucleotides having amodified nucleobase. Thus the RNA can comprise m5C (5-methylcytidine),m5U (5-methyluridine), m6A (N6-methyladenosine), s2U (2-thiouridine), Um(2′-O-methyluridine), m1A (1-methyladenosine); m2A (2-methyladenosine);Am (2′-O-methyl adenosine); ms2m6A (2-methylthio-N6-methyladenosine);i6A (N6-isopentenyladenosine); ms2i6A(2-methylthio-N6isopentenyladenosine); io6A(N6-(cis-hydroxyisopentenyl)adenosine); ms2io6A(2-methylthio-N6-(cis-hydroxyisopentenyl) adenosine); g6A(N6-glycinylcarbamoyladenosine); t6A (N6-threonyl carbamoyladenosine);ms2t6A (2-methylthio-N6-threonyl carbamoyladenosine); m6t6A(N6-methyl-N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine);hn6A(N6.-hydroxynorvalylcarbamoyl adenosine); ms2hn6A(2-methylthio-N6-hydroxynorvalyl carbamoyladenosine); Ar(p)(2′-O-ribosyl adenosine (phosphate)); I (inosine); mll(1-methylinosine); m′Im (1,2′-O-dimethylinosine); m3C(3-methylcytidine); Cm (2T-O-methylcytidine); s2C (2-thiocytidine); ac4C(N4-acetylcytidine); f5C (5-fonnylcytidine); m5Cm(5,2-O-dimethylcytidine); ac4Cm (N4acetyl2TOmethylcytidine); k2C(lysidine); m1G (1-methyl guanosine); m2G (N2-methylguanosine); m7G(7-methylguanosine); Gm (2′-O-methylguanosine); m22G(N2,N2-dimethylguanosine); m2Gm (N2,2′-O-dimethylguanosine); m22Gm(N2,N2,2′-O-trimethylguanosine); Gr(p) (2′-O-ribosylguanosine(phosphate)); yW (wybutosine); o2yW (peroxywybutosine); OHyW(hydroxywybutosine); OHyW* (undermodified hydroxywybutosine); imG(wyosine); mimG (methylguanosine); Q (queuosine); oQ (epoxyqueuosine);galQ (galtactosyl-queuosine); manQ (mannosyl-queuosine); preQo(7-cyano-7-deazaguanosine); preQi (7-aminomethyl-7-deazaguanosine); G*(archaeosine); D (dihydrouridine); m5Um (5,2′-O-dimethyluridine); s4U(4-thiouridine); m5s2U (5-methyl-2-thiouridine); s2Um(2-thio-2′-O-methyluridine); acp3U (3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl)uridine);ho5U (5-hydroxyuridine); mo5U (5-methoxyuridine); cmo5U (uridine5-oxyacetic acid); mcmo5U (uridine 5-oxyacetic acid methyl ester); chm5U(5-(carboxyhydroxymethyl)uridine)); mchm5U(5-(carboxyhydroxymethyl)uridine methyl ester); mcm5U (5-methoxycarbonylmethyluridine); mcm5Um (S-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-O-methyluricjine);mcm5 s2U (5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine); nm5 s2U(5-aminomethyl-2-thiouridine); nmm5U (5-methylaminomethyluridine);mnm5s2U (5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine); mnm5se2U(5-methylaminomethyl-2-selenouridine); ,ncm5U (5-carbamoylmethyluridine); ncm5Um (5-carbamoylmethyl-2′-O-methyluridine); cmnm5U(5-carboxymethylaminomethyluridine); cnmm5Um (5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2-L-O-methyluridine); cmnm5s2U(5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine); m62A(N6,N6-dimethyladenosine); Tm (2′-O-methylinosine); m4C(N4-methylcytidine); m4Cm (N4,2-O-dimethylcytidine); hm5C(5-hydroxymethylcytidine); m3U (3-methyluridine); cm5U(5-carboxymethyluridine); m6Am (N6,T-O-dimethyladenosine); rn62Am(N6,N6,O-2-trimethyladenosine); m2′7G (N2,7-dimethylguanosine); m2′2′7G(N2,N2,7-trimethylguanosine); m3Um (3,2T-O-dimethyluridine); m5D(5-methyldihydrouridine); f5Cm (5-formyl-2′-O-methylcytidine); 1Gm(1,2′-O-dimethylguanosine); m′Am (1,2-O-dimethyladenosine)irinomethyluridine); tm5s2U (S-taurinomethyl-2-thiouridine));imG-14 (4-demethyl guanosine); imG2 (isoguanosine); or ac6A(N6-acetyladenosine), hypoxanthine, inosine, 8-oxo-adenine,7-substituted derivatives thereof, dihydrouracil, pseudouracil,2-thiouracil, 4-thiouracil, 5-aminouracil, 5-(C1-C6)-alkyluracil,5-methyluracil, 5-(C2-C6)-alkenyluracil, 5-(C2-C6)-alkynyluracil,5-(hydroxymethyl)uracil, 5-chlorouracil, 5-fluorouracil, 5-bromouracil,5-hydroxycytosine, 5-(C1-C6)-alkylcytosine, 5-methylcytosine,5-(C2-C6)-alkenylcytosine, 5-(C2-C6)-alkynylcytosine, 5-chlorocytosine,5-fluorocytosine, 5-bromocytosine, N2-dimethylguanine, 7-deazaguanine,8-azaguanine, 7-deaza-7-substituted guanine,7-deaza-7-(C2-C6)alkynylguanine, 7-deaza-8-substituted guanine,8-hydroxyguanine, 6-thioguanine, 8-oxoguanine, 2-aminopurine,2-amino-6-chloropurine, 2,4-diaminopurine, 2,6-diaminopurine,8-azapurine, substituted 7-deazapurine, 7-deaza-7-substituted purine,7-deaza-8-substituted purine, or an abasic nucleotide. For instance, aself-replicating RNA can include one or more modified pyrimidinenucleobases, such as pseudouridine and/or 5-methylcytosine residues. Insome embodiments, however, the RNA includes no modified nucleobases, andmay include no modified nucleotides i.e. all of the nucleotides in theRNA are standard A, C, G and U ribonucleotides (except for any 5′ capstructure, which may include a 7′-methylguanosine). In otherembodiments, the RNA may include a 5′ cap comprising a7′-methylguanosine, and the first 1, 2 or 3 5′ ribonucleotides may bemethylated at the 2′ position of the ribose.

A RNA used with the invention ideally includes only phosphodiesterlinkages between nucleosides, but in some embodiments it can containphosphoramidate, phosphorothioate, and/or methylphosphonate linkages.

Ideally, a liposome includes fewer than 10 different species of RNA e.g.5, 4, 3, or 2 different species; most preferably, a liposome includes asingle RNA species i.e. all RNA molecules in the liposome have the samesequence and same length.

The amount of RNA per liposome can vary. The number of individualself-replicating RNA molecules per liposome is typically ≦50 e.g. <20,<10, <5, or 1-4 per liposome.

The Immunogen

RNA molecules used with the invention encode a polypeptide immunogen.After administration of the liposomes the RNA is translated in vivo andthe immunogen can elicit an immune response in the recipient. Theimmunogen may elicit an immune response against a bacterium, a virus, afungus or a parasite (or, in some embodiments, against an allergen; andin other embodiments, against a tumor antigen). The immune response maycomprise an antibody response (usually including IgG) and/or acell-mediated immune response. The polypeptide immunogen will typicallyelicit an immune response which recognises the corresponding bacterial,viral, fungal or parasite (or allergen or tumour) polypeptide, but insome embodiments the polypeptide may act as a mimotope to elicit animmune response which recognises a bacterial, viral, fungal or parasitesaccharide. The immunogen will typically be a surface polypeptide e.g.an adhesin, a hemagglutinin, an envelope glycoprotein, a spikeglycoprotein, etc.

The RNA molecule can encode a single polypeptide immunogen or multiplepolypeptides. Multiple immunogens can be presented as a singlepolypeptide immunogen (fusion polypeptide) or as separate polypeptides.If immunogens are expressed as separate polypeptides from a repliconthen one or more of these may be provided with an upstream IRES or anadditional viral promoter element. Alternatively, multiple immunogensmay be expressed from a polyprotein that encodes individual immunogensfused to a short autocatalytic protease (e.g. foot-and-mouth diseasevirus 2A protein), or as inteins.

Unlike references 1 and 10, the RNA encodes an immunogen. For theavoidance of doubt, the invention does not encompass RNA which encodes afirefly luciferase or which encodes a fusion protein of E. coliβ-galactosidase or which encodes a green fluorescent protein (GFP). Suchpolypeptides may be useful as markers, or even in a gene therapycontext, but the invention concerns delivery of RNA for eliciting animmunological response system. Thus the immunogen also is not a selfprotein which is delivered to supplement or substitute for a defectivehost protein (as in gene therapy). Also, the RNA is not total mousethymus RNA.

In some embodiments the immunogen elicits an immune response against oneof these bacteria:

-   -   Neisseria meningitidis: useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, membrane proteins such as adhesins,        autotransporters, toxins, iron acquisition proteins, and factor        H binding protein. A combination of three useful polypeptides is        disclosed in reference 11.    -   Streptococcus pneumoniae: useful polypeptide immunogens are        disclosed in reference 12. These include, but are not limited        to, the RrgB pilus subunit, the beta-N-acetyl-hexosaminidase        precursor (spr0057), spr0096, General stress protein GSP-781        (spr2021, SP2216), serine/threonine kinase StkP (SP1732), and        pneumococcal surface adhesin PsaA.    -   Streptococcus pyogenes: useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in references 13 and 14.    -   Moraxella catarrhalis.    -   Bordetella pertussis: Useful pertussis immunogens include, but        are not limited to, pertussis toxin or toxoid (PT), filamentous        haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin, and agglutinogens 2 and 3.    -   Staphylococcus aureus: Useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in reference 15, such as        a hemolysin, esxA, esxB, ferrichrome-binding protein (sta006)        and/or the sta011 lipoprotein.    -   Clostridium tetani: the typical immunogen is tetanus toxoid.    -   Cornynebacterium diphtheriae: the typical immunogen is        diphtheria toxoid.    -   Haemophilus influenzae: Useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in references 16 and 17.    -   Pseudomonas aeruginosa    -   Streptococcus agalactiae: useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in reference 13.    -   Chlamydia trachomatis: Useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, PepA, LcrE, ArtJ, DnaK, CT398, OmpH-like, L7/L12,        OmcA, AtoS, CT547, Eno, HtrA and MurG (e.g. as disclosed in        reference 18. LcrE [19] and HtrA [20] are two preferred        immunogens.    -   Chlamydia pneumoniae: Useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, the polypeptides disclosed in reference 21.    -   Helicobacter pylori: Useful immunogens include, but are not        limited to, CagA, VacA, NAP, and/or urease [22].    -   Escherichia coli: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited        to, immunogens derived from enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC),        enteroaggregative E. coli (EAggEC), diffusely adhering E. coli        (DAEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), extraintestinal        pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and/or enterohemorrhagic E. coli        (EHEC). ExPEC strains include uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and        meningitis/sepsis-associated E. coli (MNEC). Useful UPEC        polypeptide immunogens are disclosed in references 23 and 24.        Useful MNEC immunogens are disclosed in reference 25. A useful        immunogen for several E. coli types is AcfD [26].    -   Bacillus anthracis    -   Yersinia pestis: Useful immunogens include, but are not limited        to, those disclosed in references 27 and 28.    -   Staphylococcus epidermis    -   Clostridium perfringens or Clostridium botulinums    -   Legionella pneumophila    -   Coxiella burnetii    -   Brucella, such as B. abortus, B. canis, B. melitensis,        B.neotomae, B.ovis, B. suis, B.pinnipediae.    -   Francisella, such as F.novicida, F.philomiragia, F. tularensis.    -   Neisseria gonorrhoeae    -   Treponema pallidum    -   Haemophilus ducreyi    -   Enterococcus faecalis or Enterococcus faecium    -   Staphylococcus saprophyticus    -   Yersinia enterocolitica    -   Mycobacterium tuberculosis    -   Rickettsia    -   Listeria monocytogenes    -   Vibrio cholerae    -   Salmonella typhi    -   Borrelia burgdorferi    -   Porphyromonas gingivalis    -   Klebsiella

In some embodiments the immunogen elicits an immune response against oneof these viruses:

-   -   Orthomyxovirus: Useful immunogens can be from an influenza A, B        or C virus, such as the hemagglutinin, neuraminidase or matrix        M2 proteins. Where the immunogen is an influenza A virus        hemagglutinin it may be from any subtype e.g. H1, H2, H3, H4,        H5, H6, H7, H8, H9, H10, H11, H12, H13, H14, H15 or H16.    -   Paramyxoviridae viruses: Viral immunogens include, but are not        limited to, those derived from Pneumoviruses (e.g. respiratory        syncytial virus, RSV), Rubulaviruses (e.g. mumps virus),        Paramyxoviruses (e.g. parainfluenza virus), Metapneumoviruses        and Morbilliviruses (e.g. measles virus).    -   Poxviridae: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from Orthopoxvirus such as Variola vera, including        but not limited to, Variola major and Variola minor.    -   Picornavirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from Picornaviruses, such as Enteroviruses,        Rhinoviruses, Heparnavirus, Cardioviruses and Aphthoviruses. In        one embodiment, the enterovirus is a poliovirus e.g. a type 1,        type 2 and/or type 3 poliovirus. In another embodiment, the        enterovirus is an EV71 enterovirus. In another embodiment, the        enterovirus is a coxsackie A or B virus.    -   Bunyavirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from an Orthobunyavirus, such as California        encephalitis virus, a Phlebovirus, such as Rift Valley Fever        virus, or a Nairovirus, such as Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever        virus.    -   Heparnavirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a    -   Heparnavirus, such as hepatitis A virus (HAV).    -   Filovirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a filovirus, such as an Ebola virus        (including a Zaire, Ivory Coast, Reston or Sudan ebolavirus) or        a Marburg virus.    -   Togavirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a Togavirus, such as a Rubivirus, an        Alphavirus, or an Arterivirus. This includes rubella virus.    -   Flavivirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a Flavivirus, such as Tick-borne encephalitis        (TBE) virus, Dengue (types 1, 2, 3 or 4) virus, Yellow Fever        virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, Kyasanur Forest Virus, West        Nile encephalitis virus, St. Louis encephalitis virus, Russian        spring-summer encephalitis virus, Powassan encephalitis virus.    -   Pestivirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a Pestivirus, such as Bovine viral diarrhea        (BVDV), Classical swine fever (CSFV) or Border disease (BDV).    -   Hepadnavirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a Hepadnavirus, such as Hepatitis B virus. A        composition can include hepatitis B virus surface antigen        (HBsAg).    -   Other hepatitis viruses: A composition can include an immunogen        from a hepatitis C virus, delta hepatitis virus, hepatitis E        virus, or hepatitis G virus.    -   Rhabdovirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a Rhabdovirus, such as a Lyssavirus (e.g. a        Rabies virus) and Vesiculovirus (VSV).    -   Caliciviridae: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from Calciviridae, such as Norwalk virus        (Norovirus), and Norwalk-like Viruses, such as Hawaii Virus and        Snow Mountain Virus.    -   Coronavirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a SARS coronavirus, avian infectious        bronchitis (IBV), Mouse hepatitis virus (MHV), and Porcine        transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV). The coronavirus        immunogen may be a spike polypeptide.    -   Retrovirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from an Oncovirus, a Lentivirus (e.g. HIV-1 or        HIV-2) or a Spumavirus.    -   Reovirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from an Orthoreovirus, a Rotavirus, an Orbivirus,        or a Coltivirus.    -   Parvovirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from Parvovirus B 19.    -   Herpesvirus: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from a human herpesvirus, such as, by way of        example only, Herpes Simplex Viruses (HSV) (e.g. HSV types 1 and        2), Varicella-zoster virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV),        Cytomegalovirus (CMV), Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6), Human        Herpesvirus 7 (HHV7), and Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV8).    -   Papovaviruses: Viral immunogens include, but are not limited to,        those derived from Papillomaviruses and Polyomaviruses. The        (human) papillomavirus may be of serotype 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11,        13, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 41, 42, 47, 51, 57, 58, 63 or 65        e.g. from one or more of serotypes 6, 11, 16 and/or 18.    -   Adenovirus: Viral immunogens include those derived from        adenovirus serotype 36 (Ad-36).

In some embodiments, the immunogen elicits an immune response against avirus which infects fish, such as: infectious salmon anemia virus(ISAV), salmon pancreatic disease virus (SPDV), infectious pancreaticnecrosis virus (IPNV), channel catfish virus (CCV), fish lymphocystisdisease virus (FLDV), infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV),koi herpesvirus, salmon picorna-like virus (also known as picorna-likevirus of atlantic salmon), landlocked salmon virus (LSV), atlanticsalmon rotavirus (ASR), trout strawberry disease virus (TSD), cohosalmon tumor virus (CSTV), or viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV).

Fungal immunogens may be derived from Dermatophytres, including:Epidermophyton floccusum, Microsporum audouini, Microsporum canis,Microsporum distortum, Microsporum equinum, Microsporum gypsum,Microsporum nanum, Trichophyton concentricum, Trichophyton equinum,Trichophyton gallinae, Trichophyton gypseum, Trichophyton megnini,Trichophyton mentagrophytes, Trichophyton quinckeanum, Trichophytonrubrum, Trichophyton schoenleini, Trichophyton tonsurans, Trichophytonverrucosum, T. verrucosum var. album, var. discoides, var. ochraceum,Trichophyton violaceum, and/or Trichophyton faviforme; or fromAspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger,Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus sydowi,Aspergillus flavatus, Aspergillus glaucus, Blastoschizomyces capitatus,Candida albicans, Candida enolase, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata,Candida krusei, Candida parapsilosis, Candida stellatoidea, Candidakusei, Candida parakwsei, Candida lusitaniae, Candida pseudotropicalis,Candida guilliermondi, Cladosporium carrionii, Coccidioides immitis,Blastomyces dermatidis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Geotrichum clavatum,Histoplasma capsulatum, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Microsporidia,Encephalitozoon spp., Septata intestinalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi;the less common are Brachiola spp, Microsporidium spp., Nosema spp.,Pleistophora spp., Trachipleistophora spp., Vittaforma sppParacoccidioides brasiliensis, Pneumocystis carinii, Pythiumninsidiosum, Pityrosporum ovale, Sacharomyces cerevisae, Saccharomycesboulardii, Saccharomyces pombe, Scedosporium apiosperum, Sporothrixschenckii, Trichosporon beigelii, Toxoplasma gondii, Penicilliummarneffei, Malassezia spp., Fonsecaea spp., Wangiella spp., Sporothrixspp., Basidiobolus spp., Conidiobolus spp., Rhizopus spp, Mucor spp,Absidia spp, Mortierella spp, Cunninghamella spp, Saksenaea spp.,Alternaria spp, Curvularia spp, Helminthosporium spp, Fusarium spp,Aspergillus spp, Penicillium spp, Monolinia spp, Rhizoctonia spp,Paecilomyces spp, Pithomyces spp, and Cladosporium spp.

In some embodiments the immunogen elicits an immune response against aparasite from the Plasmodium genus, such as P.falciparum, P.vivax,P.malariae or P.ovale. Thus the invention may be used for immunisingagainst malaria. In some embodiments the immunogen elicits an immuneresponse against a parasite from the Caligidae family, particularlythose from the Lepeophtheirus and Caligus genera e.g. sea lice such asLepeophtheirus salmonis or Caligus rogercresseyi.

In some embodiments the immunogen elicits an immune response against:pollen allergens (tree-, herb, weed-, and grass pollen allergens);insect or arachnid allergens (inhalant, saliva and venom allergens, e.g.mite allergens, cockroach and midges allergens, hymenopthera venomallergens); animal hair and dandruff allergens (from e.g. dog, cat,horse, rat, mouse, etc.); and food allergens (e.g. a gliadin). Importantpollen allergens from trees, grasses and herbs are such originating fromthe taxonomic orders of Fagales, Oleales, Pinales and platanaceaeincluding, but not limited to, birch (Betula), alder (Alnus), hazel(Corylus), hornbeam (Carpinus) and olive (Olea), cedar (Cryptomeria andJuniperus), plane tree (Platanus), the order of Poales including grassesof the genera Lolium, Phleum, Poa, Cynodon, Dactylis, Holcus, Phalaris,Secale, and Sorghum, the orders of Asterales and Urticales includingherbs of the genera Ambrosia, Artemisia, and Parietaria. Other importantinhalation allergens are those from house dust mites of the genusDermatophagoides and Euroglyphus, storage mite e.g. Lepidoglyphys,Glycyphagus and Tyrophagus, those from cockroaches, midges and flease.g. Blatella, Periplaneta, Chironomus and Ctenocepphalides, and thosefrom mammals such as cat, dog and horse, venom allergens including suchoriginating from stinging or biting insects such as those from thetaxonomic order of Hymenoptera inclikling bees (Apidae), wasps(Vespidea), and ants (Formicoidae).

In some embodiments the immunogen is a tumor antigen selected from: (a)cancer-testis antigens such as NY-ESO-1, SSX2, SCP1 as well as RAGE,BAGE, GAGE and MAGE family polypeptides, for example, GAGE-1, GAGE-2,MAGE-1, MAGE-2, MAGE-3, MAGE-4, MAGE-5, MAGE-6, and MAGE-12 (which canbe used, for example, to address melanoma, lung, head and neck, NSCLC,breast, gastrointestinal, and bladder tumors; (b) mutated antigens, forexample, p53 (associated with various solid tumors, e.g., colorectal,lung, head and neck cancer), p21/Ras (associated with, e.g., melanoma,pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer), CDK4 (associated with, e.g.,melanoma), MUM1 (associated with, e.g., melanoma), caspase-8 (associatedwith, e.g., head and neck cancer), CIA 0205 (associated with, e.g.,bladder cancer), HLA-A2-R1701, beta catenin (associated with, e.g.,melanoma), TCR (associated with, e.g., T-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma),BCR-abl (associated with, e.g., chronic myelogenous leukemia),triosephosphate isomerase, KIA 0205, CDC-27, and LDLR-FUT; (c)over-expressed antigens, for example, Galectin 4 (associated with, e.g.,colorectal cancer), Galectin 9 (associated with, e.g., Hodgkin'sdisease), proteinase 3 (associated with, e.g., chronic myelogenousleukemia), WT 1 (associated with, e.g., various leukemias), carbonicanhydrase (associated with, e.g., renal cancer), aldolase A (associatedwith, e.g., lung cancer), PRAME (associated with, e.g., melanoma),HER-2/neu (associated with, e.g., breast, colon, lung and ovariancancer), mammaglobin, alpha-fetoprotein (associated with, e.g.,hepatoma), KSA (associated with, e.g., colorectal cancer), gastrin(associated with, e.g., pancreatic and gastric cancer), telomerasecatalytic protein, MUC-1 (associated with, e.g., breast and ovariancancer), G-250 (associated with, e.g., renal cell carcinoma), p53(associated with, e.g., breast, colon cancer), and carcinoembryonicantigen (associated with, e.g., breast cancer, lung cancer, and cancersof the gastrointestinal tract such as colorectal cancer); (d) sharedantigens, for example, melanoma-melanocyte differentiation antigens suchas MART-1/Melan A, gp100, MC1R, melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor,tyrosinase, tyrosinase related protein-1/TRP1 and tyrosinase relatedprotein-2/TRP2 (associated with, e.g., melanoma); (e) prostateassociated antigens such as PAP, PSA, PSMA, PSH-P1, PSM-P1, PSM-P2,associated with e.g., prostate cancer; (f) immunoglobulin idiotypes(associated with myeloma and B cell lymphomas, for example). In certainembodiments, tumor immunogens include, but are not limited to, p15,Hom/Mel-40, H-Ras, E2A-PRL, H4-RET, IGH-IGK, MYL-RAR, Epstein Barr virusantigens, EBNA, human papillomavirus (HPV) antigens, including E6 andE7, hepatitis B and C virus antigens, human T-cell lymphotropic virusantigens, TSP-180, p185erbB2, p180erbB-3, c-met, mn-23H1, TAG-72-4, CA19-9, CA 72-4, CAM 17.1, NuMa, K-ras, p16, TAGE, PSCA, CT7, 43-9F, 5T4,791 Tgp72, beta-HCG, BCA225, BTAA, CA 125, CA 15-3 (CA 27.29\BCAA), CA195, CA 242, CA-50, CAM43, CD68\KP1, CO-029, FGF-5, Ga733 (EpCAM),HTgp-175, M344, MA-50, MG7-Ag, MOV18, NB/70K, NY-CO-1, RCAS1, SDCCAG16,TA-90 (Mac-2 binding protein/cyclophilin C-associated protein), TAAL6,TAG72, TLP, TPS, and the like.

Pharmaceutical Compositions

Liposomes of the invention are useful as components in pharmaceuticalcompositions for immunising subjects against various diseases. Thesecompositions will typically include a pharmaceutically acceptablecarrier in addition to the liposomes. A thorough discussion ofpharmaceutically acceptable carriers is available in reference 29.

A pharmaceutical composition of the invention may include one or moresmall molecule immunopotentiators. For example, the composition mayinclude a TLR2 agonist (e.g. Pam3CSK4), a TLR4 agonist (e.g. anaminoalkyl glucosaminide phosphate, such as E6020), a TLR7 agonist (e.g.imiquimod), a TLR8 agonist (e.g. resiquimod) and/or a TLR9 agonist (e.g.IC31). Any such agonist ideally has a molecular weight of <2000 Da. Insome embodiments such agonist(s) are also encapsulated with the RNAinside liposomes, but in other embodiments they are unencapsulated.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may include the liposomesin plain water (e.g. w.f.i.) or in a buffer e.g. a phosphate buffer, aTris buffer, a borate buffer, a succinate buffer, a histidine buffer, ora citrate buffer. Buffer salts will typically be included in the 5-20 mMrange.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may have a pH between 5.0and 9.5 e.g. between 6.0 and 8.0.

Compositions of the invention may include, sodium salts (e.g. sodiumchloride) to give tonicity. A concentration of 10±2 mg/ml NaCl istypical e.g. about 9 mg/ml.

Compositions of the invention may include metal ion chelators. These canprolong RNA stability by removing ions which can acceleratephosphodiester hydrolysis. Thus a composition may include one or more ofEDTA, EGTA, BAPTA, pentetic acid, etc. Such chelators are typicallypresent at between 10-500 mM e.g. 0.1 mM. A citrate salt, such as sodiumcitrate, can also act as a chelator, while advantageously also providingbuffering activity.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may have an osmolality ofbetween 200 mOsm/kg and 400 mOsm/kg, e.g. between 240-360 mOsm/kg, orbetween 290-310 mOsm/kg.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may include one or morepreservatives, such as thiomersal or 2-phenoxyethanol. Mercury-freecompositions are preferred, and preservative-free vaccines can beprepared.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention are preferably sterile.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention are preferablynon-pyrogenic e.g. containing <1 EU (endotoxin unit, a standard measure)per dose, and preferably <0.1 EU per dose.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention are preferably gluten free.

Pharmaceutical compositions of the invention may be prepared in unitdose form. In some embodiments a unit dose may have a volume of between0.1-1.0 ml e.g. about 0.5 ml. The compositions may be prepared asinjectables, either as solutions or suspensions. The composition may beprepared for pulmonary administration e.g. by an inhaler, using a finespray. The composition may be prepared for nasal, aural or ocularadministration e.g. as spray or drops. Injectables for intramuscularadministration are typical.

Compositions comprise an immunologically effective amount of liposomes,as well as any other components, as needed. By ‘immunologicallyeffective amount’, it is meant that the administration of that amount toan individual, either in a single dose or as part of a series, iseffective for treatment or prevention. This amount varies depending uponthe health and physical condition of the individual to be treated, age,the taxonomic group of individual to be treated (e.g. non-human primate,primate, etc.), the capacity of the individual's immune system tosynthesise antibodies, the degree of protection desired, the formulationof the vaccine, the treating doctor's assessment of the medicalsituation, and other relevant factors. It is expected that the amountwill fall in a relatively broad range that can be determined throughroutine trials. The liposome and RNA content of compositions of theinvention will generally be expressed in terms of the amount of RNA perdose. A preferred dose has ≦100 μg RNA (e.g. from 10-100 μg, such asabout 10 μg, 25 μg, 50 μg, 75 μg or 100 μg), but expression can be seenat much lower levels e.g. ≦1 μg/dose, ≦100 ng/dose, ≦10 ng/dose, ≦1ng/dose, etc

The invention also provides a delivery device (e.g. syringe, nebuliser,sprayer, inhaler, dermal patch, etc.) containing a pharmaceuticalcomposition of the invention. This device can be used to administer thecomposition to a vertebrate subject.

Liposomes of the invention do not contain ribosomes.

Methods of treatment and medical uses

In contrast to the particles disclosed in reference 10, liposomes andpharmaceutical compositions of the invention are for in vivo use foreliciting an immune response against an immunogen of interest.

The invention provides a method for raising an immune response in avertebrate comprising the step of administering an effective amount of aliposome or pharmaceutical composition of the invention. The immuneresponse is preferably protective and preferably involves antibodiesand/or cell-mediated immunity. The method may raise a booster response.

The invention also provides a liposome or pharmaceutical composition ofthe invention for use in a method for raising an immune response in avertebrate.

The invention also provides the use of a liposome of the invention inthe manufacture of a medicament for raising an immune response in avertebrate.

By raising an immune response in the vertebrate by these uses andmethods, the vertebrate can be protected against various diseases and/orinfections e.g. against bacterial and/or viral diseases as discussedabove. The liposomes and compositions are immunogenic, and are morepreferably vaccine compositions. Vaccines according to the invention mayeither be prophylactic (i.e. to prevent infection) or therapeutic (i.e.to treat infection), but will typically be prophylactic.

The vertebrate is preferably a mammal, such as a human or a largeveterinary mammal (e.g. horses, cattle, deer, goats, pigs). Where thevaccine is for prophylactic use, the human is preferably a child (e.g. atoddler or infant) or a teenager; where the vaccine is for therapeuticuse, the human is preferably a teenager or an adult. A vaccine intendedfor children may also be administered to adults e.g. to assess safety,dosage, immunogenicity, etc.

Vaccines prepared according to the invention may be used to treat bothchildren and adults. Thus a human patient may be less than 1 year old,less than 5 years old, 1-5 years old, 5-15 years old, 15-55 years old,or at least 55 years old. Preferred patients for receiving the vaccinesare the elderly (e.g. ≧50 years old, ≧60 years old, and preferably ≧65years), the young (e.g. ≦5 years old), hospitalised patients, healthcareworkers, armed service and military personnel, pregnant women, thechronically ill, or immunodeficient patients. The vaccines are notsuitable solely for these groups, however, and may be used moregenerally in a population.

Compositions of the invention will generally be administered directly toa patient. Direct delivery may be accomplished by parenteral injection(e.g. subcutaneously, intraperitoneally, intravenously, intramuscularly,intradermally, or to the interstitial space of a tissue; unlikereference 1, intraglossal injection is not typically used with thepresent invention). Alternative delivery routes include rectal, oral(e.g. tablet, spray), buccal, sublingual, vaginal, topical, transdermalor transcutaneous, intranasal, ocular, aural, pulmonary or other mucosaladministration. Intradermal and intramuscular administration are twopreferred routes. Injection may be via a needle (e.g. a hypodermicneedle), but needle-free injection may alternatively be used. A typicalintramuscular dose is 0.5 ml.

The invention may be used to elicit systemic and/or mucosal immunity,preferably to elicit an enhanced systemic and/or mucosal immunity.

Dosage can be by a single dose schedule or a multiple dose schedule.Multiple doses may be used in a primary immunisation schedule and/or ina booster immunisation schedule. In a multiple dose schedule the variousdoses may be given by the same or different routes e.g. a parenteralprime and mucosal boost, a mucosal prime and parenteral boost, etc.Multiple doses will typically be administered at least 1 week apart(e.g. about 2 weeks, about 3 weeks, about 4 weeks, about 6 weeks, about8 weeks, about 10 weeks, about 12 weeks, about 16 weeks, etc.). In oneembodiment, multiple doses may be administered approximately 6 weeks, 10weeks and 14 weeks after birth, e.g. at an age of 6 weeks, 10 weeks and14 weeks, as often used in the World Health Organisation's ExpandedProgram on Immunisation (“EPI”). In an alternative embodiment, twoprimary doses are administered about two months apart, e.g. about 7, 8or 9 weeks apart, followed by one or more booster doses about 6 monthsto 1 year after the second primary dose, e.g. about 6, 8, 10 or 12months after the second primary dose. In a further embodiment, threeprimary doses are administered about two months apart, e.g. about 7, 8or 9 weeks apart, followed by one or more booster doses about 6 monthsto 1 year after the third primary dose, e.g. about 6, 8, 10, or 12months after the third primary dose.

Formula (X)

Compounds of formula (X) contains a hydrophilic polymer head grouplinked to a lipid moiety. They can be described as “stealth lipids” andthey have formula:

wherein:

Z is a hydrophilic head group component selected from PEG and polymersbased on poly(oxazoline), poly(ethylene oxide), poly(vinyl alcohol),poly(glycerol), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone),poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] and poly(amino acids, whereinthe polymer may be linear or branched, and wherein the polymer may beoptionally substituted;

wherein Z is polymerized by n subunits;

n is a number-averaged degree of polymerization between 10 and 200 unitsof Z, wherein n is optimized for different polymer types;

L₁ is an optionally substituted C₁₋₁₀ alkylene or C₁₋₁₀heteroalkylenelinker including zero, one or two of an ether (e.g., —O—), ester (e.g.,—C(O)O—), succinate (e.g., —O(O)C—CH₂—CH₂—C(O)O—)), carbamate (e.g.,—OC(O)—NR′—), carbonate (e.g., —OC(O)O—), urea (e.g., —NRC(O)NR′—),amine (e.g., —NR′—), amide (e.g., —C(O)NR′—), imine (e.g., —C(NR′)—),thioether (e.g., —S—), xanthate (e.g., —OC(S)S—), and phosphodiester(e.g., —OP(O)₂O—),

wherein R′ is independently selected from —H, —NH—, —NH₂, —O—; —S—, aphosphate or an optionally substituted C₁₋₁₀ alkylene;

X₁ and X₂ are independently selected from a carbon or a heteroatomselected from —NH—, —O—, —S— or a phosphate;

A₁ and A₂ are independently selected from a C₆₋₃₀ alkyl, C₆₋₃₀ alkenyl,and C₆₋₃₀ alkynyl, wherein A₁ and A₂ may be the same or different, or A₁and A₂ together with the carbon atom to which they are attached form anoptionally substituted steroid.

In one embodiment, the compound of formula (X) has formula (X)

wherein

PEG is a poly(ethylene glycol) subunit, wherein the PEG may be linear orbranched;

n is a number-averaged degree of polymerization between 10 and 200 unitsof PEG, preferably around 45 units;

L₁ is an optionally substituted C₁₋₁₀ heteroalkylene linker containingone or two of an ether, ester, succinate, carbamate, carbonate, urea,amine, amide, imine, thioether, xanthate, and phosphodiester;

X₁ and X₂ are oxygen;

A₁ and A₂ are independently selected from a C₆₋₃₀ alkyl, C₆₋₃₀ alkenyl,and C₆₋₃₀ alkynyl, wherein A₁ and A₂ may be the same or different, orwherein A₁ and A₂ together with the carbon atom to which they areattached form an optionally substituted steroid.

The lipids of formulae (X) and (X′), when formulated with cationiclipids to form liposomes, can increase the length of time for which aliposome can exist in vivo (e.g. in the blood). They can shield thesurface of a liposome surface and thereby reduce opsonisation by bloodproteins and uptake by macrophages. Further details are in references 30and 31. In one embodiment, the lipid comprises a group selected from PEG(sometimes referred to as poly(ethylene oxide)) and polymers based onpoly(oxazoline), poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(glycerol),poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] andpoly(amino acid)s.

Suitable PEGylated lipids for use with the invention includepolyethyleneglycol-diacylglycerol or polyethyleneglycol-diacylglycamide(PEG-DAG) conjugates including those comprising a dialkylglycerol ordialkylglycamide group having alkyl chain length independentlycomprising from about C4 to about C40 saturated or unsaturated carbonatoms. The dialkylglycerol or dialkylglycamide group can furthercomprise one or more substituted alkyl groups. The PEGyltaed lipid canbe selected from PEG-dilaurylglycerol, PEG-dimyristylglycerol (catalog#GM-020 from NOF), PEG-dipalmitoylglycerol, PEG-disterylglycerol,PEG-dilaurylglycamide, PEG-dimyristylglycamide,PEG-dipalmitoyl-glycamide, and PEG-disterylglycamide, PEG-cholesterol(1-[8′-(Cholest-5-en-3[beta]-oxy)carboxamido-3′,6′-dioxaoctanyl]carbamoyl-[omega]-methyl-poly(ethyleneglycol), PEG-DMB (3,4-Ditetradecoxylbenzyl-[omega]-methyl-poly(ethyleneglycol)ether),1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethyleneglycol)-2000] (catalog #880150P from Avanti Polar Lipids). Other usefulPEGylated lipids are S001, S002, S003, S004, S005, S006, S007, S008,S009, S010, S011, and CS-020SA (NOF); S010 and S011 are disclosed inref. 32 under the labels IVa and IVc, respectively. In ref. 32, adifferent synthesis from that reported herein is used to prepare IVa andIVc.

Chemical terms and Definitions

Halo

The term “halogen” (or “halo”) includes fluorine, chlorine, bromine andiodine.

Alkyl, alkylene, alkenvl, alkvnvl, cycloalkyl etc.

The terms “alkyl”, “alkylene”, “alkenyl” and “alkynyl” are used hereinto refer to both straight and branched chain acyclic forms. Cyclicanalogues thereof are referred to as cycloalkyl, etc.

The term “alkyl” includes monovalent, straight or branched, saturated,acyclic hydrocarbyl groups. In one embodiment alkyl is C₁₋₁₀alkyl, inanother embodiment C₁₋₆alkyl, in another embodiment C₁₋₄alkyl, such asmethyl, ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl or t-butyl groups.

The term “cycloalkyl” includes monovalent, saturated, cyclic hydrocarbylgroups. In one embodiment cycloalkyl is C₃₋₁₀cycloalkyl, in anotherembodiment C₃₋₆cycloalkyl such as cyclopentyl and cyclohexyl.

The term “alkoxy” means alkyl-O—.

The term “alkenyl” includes monovalent, straight or branched,unsaturated, acyclic hydrocarbyl groups having at least onecarbon-carbon double bond and, in one embodiment, no carbon-carbontriple bonds. In one embodiment alkenyl is C₂₋₁₀alkenyl, in anotherembodiment C₂₋₆alkenyl, in another embodiment C₂₋₄alkenyl.

The term “cycloalkenyl” includes monovalent, partially unsaturated,cyclic hydrocarbyl groups having at least one carbon-carbon double bondand, in one embodiment, no carbon-carbon triple bonds. In one embodimentcycloalkenyl is C₃₋₁₀cycloalkenyl, in another embodimentC₅₋₁₀cycloalkenyl, e.g. cyclohexenyl or benzocyclohexyl.

The term “alkynyl” includes monovalent, straight or branched,unsaturated, acyclic hydrocarbyl groups having at least onecarbon-carbon triple bond and, in one embodiment, no carbon-carbondouble bonds. In one embodiment, alkynyl is C₂₋₁₀alkynyl, in anotherembodiment C₂₋₆alkynyl, in another embodiment C₂₋₄alkynyl.

The term “cycloalkynyl” includes monovalent, partially unsaturated,cyclic hydrocarbyl groups having at least one carbon-carbon triple bondand, in one embodiment, no carbon-carbon double bonds. In one embodimentcycloalkynyl is C₃₋₁₀cycloalkenyl, in another embodimentC₅₋₁₀cycloalkynyl

The term “alkylene” includes divalent, straight or branched, saturated,acyclic hydrocarbyl groups. In one embodiment alkylene is C₁₋₁₀alkylene,in another embodiment C₁₋₆alkylene, in another embodiment C₁₋₄alkylene,such as methylene, ethylene, n-propylene, i-propylene or t-butylenegroups.

The term “alkenylene” includes divalent, straight or branched,unsaturated, acyclic hydrocarbyl groups having at least onecarbon-carbon double bond and, in one embodiment, no carbon-carbontriple bonds. In one embodiment alkenylene is C₂₋₁₀alkenylene, inanother embodiment C₂₋₆alkenylene, in another embodiment C₂₋₄alkenylene.

The term “alkynylene” includes divalent, straight or branched,unsaturated, acyclic hydrocarbyl groups having at least onecarbon-carbon triple bond and, in one embodiment, no carbon-carbondouble bonds. In one embodiment alkynylene is C₂₋₁₀alkynylene, inanother embodiment C₂₋₆alkynylene, in another embodiment C₂₋₄alkynylene.

Heteroalkvl etc.

The term “heteroalkyl” includes alkyl groups in which up to six carbonatoms, in one embodiment up to five carbon atoms, in another embodimentup to four carbon atoms, in another embodiment up to three carbon atoms,in another embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in another embodiment onecarbon atom, are each replaced independently by O, S(O)_(q), N, P(O)_(s)or Si (and preferably O, S(O)_(q) or N), provided at least one of thealkyl carbon atoms remains. The heteroalkyl group may be C-linked orhetero-linked, i.e. it may be linked to the remainder of the moleculethrough a carbon atom or through O, S(O)_(q), N, P(O)_(r) or Si.

The term “heterocycloalkyl” includes cycloalkyl groups in which up tosix carbon atoms, in one embodiment up to five carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment up to four carbon atoms, in another embodiment up to threecarbon atoms, in another embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently by O,S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the cycloalkyl carbon atomsremains. Examples of heterocycloalkyl groups include oxiranyl,thiaranyl, aziridinyl, oxetanyl, thiatanyl, azetidinyl,tetrahydrofuranyl, tetrahydrothiophenyl, pyrrolidinyl,tetrahydropyranyl, tetrahydrothiopyranyl, piperidinyl, 1,4-dioxanyl,1,4-oxathianyl, morpholinyl, 1,4-dithianyl, piperazinyl, 1,4-azathianyl,oxepanyl, thiepanyl, azepanyl, 1,4-dioxepanyl, 1,4-oxathiepanyl,1,4-oxaazepanyl, 1,4-dithiepanyl, 1,4-thieazepanyl and 1,4-diazepanyl.The heterocycloalkyl group may be C-linked or N-linked, i.e. it may belinked to the remainder of the molecule through a carbon atom or througha nitrogen atom.

The term “heteroalkenyl” includes alkenyl groups in which up to threecarbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently by O,S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the alkenyl carbon atomsremains. The heteroalkenyl group may be C-linked or hetero-linked, i.e.it may be linked to the remainder of the molecule through a carbon atomor through O, S(O)_(q) or N.

The term “heterocycloalkenyl” includes cycloalkenyl groups in which upto three carbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, inanother embodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently byO, S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the cycloalkenyl carbon atomsremains. Examples of heterocycloalkenyl groups include3,4-dihydro-2H-pyranyl, 5-6-dihydro-2H-pyranyl, 2H-pyranyl,1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridinyl and 1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridinyl. Theheterocycloalkenyl group may be C-linked or N-linked, i.e. it may belinked to the remainder of the molecule through a carbon atom or througha nitrogen atom.

The term “heteroalkynyl” includes alkynyl groups in which up to threecarbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently by O,S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the alkynyl carbon atomsremains. The heteroalkynyl group may be C-linked or hetero-linked, i.e.it may be linked to the remainder of the molecule through a carbon atomor through O, S(O)_(q) or N.

The term “heterocycloalkynyl” includes cycloalkynyl groups in which upto three carbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, inanother embodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently byO, S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the cycloalkynyl carbon atomsremains. The heterocycloalkenyl group may be C-linked or N-linked, i.e.it may be linked to the remainder of the molecule through a carbon atomor through a nitrogen atom.

The term “heteroalkylene” includes alkylene groups in which up to threecarbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently by O,S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the alkylene carbon atomsremains.

The term “heteroalkenylene” includes alkenylene groups in which up tothree carbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently by O,S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the alkenylene carbon atomsremains.

The term “heteroalkynylene” includes alkynylene groups in which up tothree carbon atoms, in one embodiment up to two carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment one carbon atom, are each replaced independently by O,S(O)_(q) or N, provided at least one of the alkynylene carbon atomsremains.

Aryl

The term “aryl” includes monovalent, aromatic, cyclic hydrocarbylgroups, such as phenyl or naphthyl (e.g. 1-naphthyl or 2-naphthyl). Ingeneral, the aryl groups may be monocyclic or polycyclic fused ringaromatic groups. Preferred aryl are C₆-C₁₀aryl.

Other examples of aryl groups are monovalent derivatives ofaceanthrylene, acenaphthylene, acephenanthrylene, anthracene, azulene,chrysene, coronene, fluoranthene, fluorene, as-indacene, s-indacene,indene, naphthalene, ovalene, perylene, phenalene, phenanthrene, picene,pleiadene, pyrene, pyranthrene and rubicene.

The term “arylalkyl” means alkyl substituted with an aryl group, e.g.benzyl.

The term “arylene” includes divalent aromatic, cyclic hydrocarbylgroups, such as phenylene. In general, the arylene groups may bemonocyclic or polycyclic fused ring aromatic groups. Preferred aryleneare C₆-C₁₀arylene. Other examples of arylene groups are divalentderivatives of aceanthrylene, acenaphthylene, acephenanthrylene,anthracene, azulene, chrysene, coronene, fluoranthene, fluorene,as-indacene, s-indacene, indene, naphthalene, ovalene, perylene,phenalene, phenanthrene, picene, pleiadene, pyrene, pyranthrene andrubicene.

Heteroaryl

The term “heteroaryl” includes monovalent, heteroaromatic, cyclichydrocarbyl groups additionally containing one or more heteroatomsindependently selected from O, S, N and NR^(N), where R^(N) is definedbelow (and in one embodiment is H or alkyl (e.g. C₁₋₆alkyl)).

In general, the heteroaryl groups may be monocyclic or polycyclic (e.g.bicyclic) fused ring heteroaromatic groups. In one embodiment,heteroaryl groups contain 5-13 ring members (preferably 5-10 members)and 1, 2, 3 or 4 ring heteroatoms independently selected from O, S, Nand NR^(N). In one embodiment, a heteroaryl group may be 5, 6, 9 or 10membered, e.g. 5-membered monocyclic, 6-membered monocyclic, 9-memberedfused-ring bicyclic or 10-membered fused-ring bicyclic.

Monocyclic heteroaromatic groups include heteroaromatic groupscontaining 5-6 ring members and 1, 2, 3 or 4 heteroatoms selected fromO, S, N or NR^(N).

In one embodiment, 5-membered monocyclic heteroaryl groups contain 1ring member which is an —NR^(N)— group, an —O— atom or an —S— atom and,optionally, 1-3 ring members (e.g. 1 or 2 ring members) which are ═N—atoms (where the remainder of the 5 ring members are carbon atoms).

Examples of 5-membered monocyclic heteroaryl groups are pyrrolyl,furanyl, thiophenyl, pyrazolyl, imidazolyl, isoxazolyl, oxazolyl,isothiazolyl, thiazolyl, 1,2,3 triazolyl, 1,2,4 triazolyl, 1,2,3oxadiazolyl, 1,2,4 oxadiazolyl, 1,2,5 oxadiazolyl, 1,3,4 oxadiazolyl,1,3,4 thiadiazolyl, pyridyl, pyrimidinyl, pyridazinyl, pyrazinyl, 1,3,5triazinyl, 1,2,4 triazinyl, 1,2,3 triazinyl and tetrazolyl.

Examples of 6-membered monocyclic heteroaryl groups are pyridinyl,pyridazinyl, pyrimidinyl and pyrazinyl.

In one embodiment, 6-membered monocyclic heteroaryl groups contain 1 or2 ring members which are ═N— atoms (where the remainder of the 6 ringmembers are carbon atoms).

Bicyclic heteroaromatic groups include fused-ring heteroaromatic groupscontaining 9-13 ring members and 1, 2, 3, 4 or more heteroatoms selectedfrom O, S, N or NR^(N).

In one embodiment, 9-membered bicyclic heteroaryl groups contain 1 ringmember which is an —NR^(N)— group, an —O— atom or an —S— atom and,optionally, 1-3 ring members (e.g. 1 or 2 ring members) which are ═N—atoms (where the remainder of the 9 ring members are carbon atoms).

Examples of 9-membered fused-ring bicyclic heteroaryl groups arebenzofuranyl, benzothiophenyl, indolyl, benzimidazolyl, indazolyl,benzotriazolyl, pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridinyl, pyrrolo[2,3-c]pyridinyl,pyrrolo[3,2-c]pyridinyl, pyrrolo[3,2-b]pyridinyl,imidazo[4,5-b]pyridinyl, imidazo[4,5-c]pyridinyl,pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyridinyl, pyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridinyl,pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridinyl, pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridinyl, isoindolyl,indazolyl, purinyl, indolininyl, imidazo[1,2-a]pyridinyl,imidazo[1,5-a]pyridinyl, pyrazolo[1,2-a]pyridinyl,pyrrolo[1,2-b]pyridazinyl and imidazo[1,2-c]pyrimidinyl.

In one embodiment, 10-membered bicyclic heteroaryl groups contain 1-3ring members which are ═N— atoms (Where the remainder of the 10 ringmembers are carbon atoms).

Examples of 10-membered fused-ring bicyclic heteroaryl groups arequinolinyl, isoquinolinyl, cinnolinyl, quinazolinyl, quinoxalinyl,phthalazinyl, 1,6-naphthyridinyl, 1,7-naphthyridinyl,1,8-naphthyridinyl, 1,5-naphthyridinyl, 2,6-naphthyridinyl,2,7-naphthyridinyl, pyrido [3 ,2-d]pyrimidinyl,pyrido[4,3-d]pyrimidinyl, pyrido[3,4-d]pyrimidinyl, pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidinyl, pyrido[2,3-b]pyrazinyl, pyrido[3,4-b]pyrazinyl,pyrimido[5,4-d]pyrimidinyl, pyrazino[2,3-b]pyrazinyl andpyrimido[4,5-d]pyrimidinyl.

The term “heteroarylalkyl” means alkyl substituted with a heteroarylgroup.

The term “heteroarylene” includes divalent heteroaromatic, cyclichydrocarbyl groups additionally containing one or more heteroatomsindependently selected from O, S, N and NR^(N), where R^(N) is definedbelow (and in one embodiment is H or alkyl (e.g. C₁₋₆alkyl)). Ingeneral, the heteroarylene groups may be monocyclic or polycyclic (e.g.bicyclic) fused ring heteroaromatic groups. In one embodiment,heteroarylene groups contain 5-13 ring members (preferably 5-10 members)and 1, 2, 3 or 4 ring heteroatoms independently selected from O, S, Nand NR^(N). In one embodiment, a heteroarylene group may be 5, 6, 9 or10 membered, e.g. 5-membered monocyclic, 6-membered monocyclic,9-membered fused-ring bicyclic or 10-membered fused-ring bicyclic. Theterm “heteroarylene” includes divalent derivatives of each of theheteroaryl groups discussed above.

The terms “aryl”, “aromatic”, “heteroaryl” and “heteroaromatic” alsoinclude groups that are partially reduced. Thus, for example,“heteroaryl” includes fused species in which one of the rings has beenreduced to a saturated ring (e.g.1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl).

General

Unless indicated explicitly otherwise, where combinations of groups arereferred to herein as one moiety, e.g. arylalkyl, the last mentionedgroup contains the atom by which the moiety is attached to the rest ofthe molecule.

Where reference is made to a carbon atom of an alkyl group or othergroup being replaced by O, S(O)_(q), N or P(O)_(r), what is intended isthat:

is replaced by

(wherein E cannot be H);

—CH=is replaced by —N= or —P(O)_(r)═;

≡C—H is replaced by ≡N or ≡P(O)_(r); or

—CH₂— is replaced by —O—, —S(O)_(q)—, —NR^(N)— or —P(O)R^(N)—, whereR^(N) is H or optionally substituted C₁₋₆alkyl, C₁₋₆heteroalkyl,C₃₋₆cycloalkyl, C₃₋₆heterocycloalkyl, C₂₋₆alkenyl, C₂₋₆heteroalkenyl,C₃₋₆cycloalkenyl, C₃₋₆heterocycloalkenyl, phenyl, or heteroarylcontaining 5 or 6 ring members. R^(N) is preferably H, C₁₋₆alkyl orC₃₋₆cycloalkyl.

q is independently 0, 1 or 2. In one embodiment, q is 0.

r is independently 0 or 1. In one embodiment, r is 0.

Where reference is made to a carbon atom being replaced by Si, what isintended is that the carbon atom is swapped for a silicon atom but thatthe bonds otherwise remain the same. Thus, for example, —CH₂— isreplaced by —SiH₂—; —CH= is replaced by —SiH=; and ≡C—H is replaced by

By way of clarification, in relation to the above mentioned heteroatomcontaining groups (such as heteroalkyl etc.), where a numerical ofcarbon atoms is given, for instance C₃₋₆heteroalkyl, what is intended isa group based on C₃₋₆alkyl in which one or more of the 3-6 chain carbonatoms is replaced by O, S(O)_(q) or N. Accordingly, a C₃₋₆heteroalkylgroup would, for example, contain less than 3-6 chain carbon atoms. Asanother example, a pyridyl group would be classed as a C₆ heteroarylgroup even though it contains 5 carbon atoms.

Substitution

Groups of the compounds of the invention (e.g. alkyl, cycloalkyl,alkoxy, alkenyl, cycloalkenyl, alkynyl, alkylene, alkenylene,heteroalkyl, heterocycloalkyl, heteroalkenyl, heterocycloalkenyl,heteroalkynyl, heteroalkylene, heteroalkenylene aryl, arylalkyl,arylheteroalkyl, heteroaryl, heteroarylalkyl or heteroarylheteroalkylgroups etc.) may be substituted or unsubstituted, in one embodimentunsubstituted. Typically, substitution involves the notional replacementof a hydrogen atom with a substituent group, or two hydrogen atoms inthe case of substitution by ═O.

Where substituted, there will generally be 1 to 5 substituents on eachgroup, in one embodiment 1 to 3 substituents, in one embodiment 1 or 2substituents, in one embodiment 1 substituent. One embodiment includesmore than one substituent on the same atom, e.g. an acetal group.

In one embodiment, the substituent(s) is/are independently Sub' or Sub²(in one embodiment Sub²) wherein:

-   -   Sub¹ is independently halogen, trihalomethyl, trihaloethyl,        —NO₂, —CN,—N⁺(R^(s))₂O⁻, —CO₂H, —CO₂R^(s), —SO₃H, —SOR^(s),        —SO₂R^(s), —SO₃R^(s), —OC(═O)OR^(s), —C(═O)H, —C(═O)R^(s),        —OC(═O)R^(s), ═O, —NR^(s) ₂, —C(═O)NH₂, —C(═O)NR^(s) ₂,        —N(R^(s))C(═O)OR^(s), —N(R^(s))C(═O)NR^(s) ₂, —OC(═O)NR^(s) ₂,        —N(R^(s))C(═O)R^(s), —C(═S)NR^(s) ₂, —NR^(s)C(═S)R^(s),        —SO₂NR^(s) ₂, —NR^(s)SO₂R^(s), —N(R^(s))C(═S)NR^(s) ₂,        —N(R^(s))SO₂NR^(s) ₂, —R^(s) or —Z^(s)R^(s),        wherein;        -   Z^(s) is independently O, S or NR^(s);        -   R^(s) is independently H or C₁₋₆alkyl, C₁₋₆heteroalkyl,            -(Alk^(a))_(f)-C₃₋₆cycloalkyl,            -(Alk^(a))_(f)-C₃₋₆heterocycloalkyl, C₂₋₆alkenyl,            C₂₋₆heteroalkenyl, -(Alk^(a))_(f)-C₃₋₆cycloalkenyl,            -(Alk^(a))_(f)-C₃₋₆heterocycloalkenyl, C₂₋₆alkynyl,            C₂₋₆heteroalkynyl, -(Alk^(a))_(f)-C₆₋₁₄aryl,            -(Alk^(a))_(f)-C₆₋₁₄aryl or -(Alk^(a))_(f)-heteroaryl (where            heteroaryl contains 5-13 ring members), where            -   f is 0 or 1;            -   Alk^(a) is C₁₋₆alkylene or C₁₋₆heteroalkylene; and            -   R^(s) is optionally substituted itself (in one                embodiment unsubstituted) by 1 to 3 substituents Sub²;    -   Sub² is independently halogen, trihalomethyl, trihaloethyl,        —NO₂, —CN, —N⁺(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂O⁻, —CO₂H, —CO₂C₁₋₆alkyl, —SO₃H,        —SOC₁₋₆alkyl, —SO₂C₁₋₆alkyl, —SO₃C₁₋₆alkyl, —OC(═O)OC₁₋₆alkyl,        —C(═O)H, —C(═O)C₁₋₆alkyl, —OC(═O)C₁₋₆alkyl, ═O, —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂,        —C(═O)NH₂, —C(O)N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂, —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)C(═O)O(C₁₋₆alkyl),        —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)C(═O)N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂, —OC(═O)N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂,        —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)C(═O)C alkyl, —C(═S)N(C ₁₋₆alkyl)₂,        —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)C(═S)C₁₋₆alkyl, —SO₂N(C ₁₋₆alkyl)₂,        —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)SO₂C₁₋₆alkyl, —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)C(═S)N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂,        —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)SO₂N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂, —C₁₋₆alkyl, -C₁₋₆heteroalkyl,        —C₃₋₆cycloalkyl, —C₃₋₆heterocycloalkyl, —C₂₋₆alkenyl,        —C₂₋₆heteroalkenyl, —C₃₋₆cycloalkenyl, —C₃₋₆heterocycloalkenyl,        —C₂₋₆alkynyl, —C₂₋₆heteroalkynyl, —C₆₋₁₄aryl, —C₅₋₁₃hetero,        aryl, —Z^(t)—C₁₋₆alkyl, —Z^(t)—C₃₋₆cycloalkyl,        —Z^(t)—C₂₋₆alkenyl, —Z^(t)—C₃₋₆cycloalkenyl, or        —Z^(t)—C₂₋₆alkynyl; and        -   Z^(t) is independently O, S, NH or N(C₁₋₆alkyl).

While R^(s) in Sub¹ can be optionally substituted by 1 to 3 substituentsSub², Sub² is unsubstituted.

However, in one embodiment, R^(s) is unsubstituted.

In one embodiment, Rs is H or C₁₋₆alkyl, optionally substituted by 1 to3 substituents Sub².

In one embodiment, Sub² is independently halogen, trihalomethyl,trihaloethyl, —NO₂, —CN, —N⁺(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂O⁻,—CO₂H, —SO₃H, —SOC₁₋₆alkyl,—SO₂C₁₋₆alkyl, —C(═O)H, —C(═O)C₁₋₆alkyl, ═O, —N(C₁₋₆alkyl)₂, —C(═O)NH₂,—C₁₋₆alkyl, —C₃₋₆cycloalkyl, —C₃₋₆heterocycloalkyl, —Z^(t)—C₁₋₆alkyl or—Z^(t)—C₃₋₆cycloalkyl.

In one embodiment, where the substituted group is acyclic (e.g. alkyl,heteroalkyl, alkenyl etc.), Sub¹ is not —R^(s) and Sub² is not—C₁₋₆alkyl, —C₁₋₆heteroalkyl, —C₂₋₆alkenyl, —C₂₋₆heteroalkenyl,—C₂₋₆alkynyl or —C₂₋₆heteroalkynyl.

Where a group other than Sub² has at least 2 positions which may besubstituted, the group may be substituted by both ends of an alkylene,alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, heteroalkenylene orheteroalkynylene chain (in one embodiment containing 1 to 6 atoms, in afurther embodiment 3 to 6 atoms, and in a further embodiment 3 or 4atoms) to form a cyclic moiety. That chain is optionally substituted by1 to 3 substituents Sub². In one embodiment that chain is notsubstituted. Thus, the terms optionally substituted “cycloalkyl”,“cycloalkenyl”, “cycloalkynyl”, “heterocycloalkyl”,“heterocycloalkenyl”, “heterocycloalkynyl”, “aryl” and “heteroaryl”include fused species. E.g. “optionally substituted cycloalkyl” includesa species in which two cycloalkyl rings are fused, and “optionallysubstituted heteroaryl” includes a species in which a heterocycloalkylring is fused to the aromatic ring (e.g. 5 ,6,7,8-tetrahydro- 1,8-naphthyridin-2-yl).

Where a group other than Sub² has an atom which may be substitutedtwice, that atom may be substituted by both ends of an alkylene,alkenylene, alkynylene, heteroalkylene, heteroalkenylene orheteroalkynylene chain (in one embodiment containing 2 to 8 atoms, in afurther embodiment 3 to 6 atoms, and in a further embodiment 4 or 5atoms) to form a cyclic moiety. That chain is optionally substituted by1 to 3 substituents Sub². In one embodiment that chain is notsubstituted. Thus, the terms optionally substituted “cycloalkyl”,“cycloalkenyl”, “cycloalkynyl”, “heterocycloalkyl”,“heterocycloalkenyl”, “heterocycloalkynyl”, “aryl” and “heteroaryl”include spiro species.

By way of clarification, when a group has a heteroatom, a substituentmay be bonded to the heteroatom. Thus, for example, “optionallysubstituted heteroalkyl” includes —CH₂—N(Sub¹)—CH₂—, —CH(Sub¹)—NH—CH₂—and —CH(Sub¹)—N(Sub¹)—CH₂— etc.

Modifier Terms

When a list is preceded by a modifier, it is intended that the modifieris to be understood as applying to each of the items in the list. Forexample, the phrase “optionally substituted C₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkyl,C₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkenyl, C₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkynyl or C₅.₂₀-heteroarylgroup” means that each of the four items in the list, namely theC₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkyl group, the C₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkenyl group, theC₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkynyl group and the C₆₋₂₀-heteroaryl group, may beoptionally substituted.

When a group is characterised by a first modifier and then, later on,the same group is characterised by a subsequent modifier, what is meantis that the group is characterised by both modifiers simultaneously. Forexample, if a group is described as a “C₃₋₂₀-heterocycloalkynyl” (thefirst modifier) group and then later the same group is described as a“C₅₋₁₆” (the subsequent modifier) group, what is meant is a C₅₋₁₆heterocycloalkynyl group.

Steroids

As used herein, the term “steroid” refers to any group comprising thefollowing structure (which structure is referred to herein as the“steroid skeleton”).

Purely for the purposes of illustration, the steroid skeleton has beendrawn above as fully saturated. The term steroid, however, is alsointended to cover instances where there is unsaturation in the steroidskeleton. For example, the term steroid covers a group which comprisesthe fully unsaturated (mancude) basic skeleton,15H-cyclopenta[a]phenanthrene:

The term steroid also covers a group which comprises a partiallyunsaturated steroid skeleton.

The term steroid also covers “seco” derivatives of the steroid skeleton,i.e. groups in which ring cleavage has been effected; “nor” and “homo”derivatives of the steroid skeleton which involve ring contraction andexpansion, respectively (see Systemic Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry,by D. Hellwinkel, published by Springer, 2001, ISBN: 3-540-41138-0, page203 for “seco” and page 204 for “nor” and “homo”). In one embodiment,however, such seco derivatives are not encompassed by the term“steroid”. In another embodiment, such nor derivatives are notencompassed by the term “steroid”. In another embodiment, such homoderivatives are not encompassed by the term “steroid”. Thus in oneembodiment, such seco, nor and homo derivatives are not encompassed bythe term “steroid”.

The term steroid also covers instances where one or more of the carbonatoms in the structure labelled steroid skeleton is replaced by aheteroatom. In one such embodiment, up to six carbon atoms, in oneembodiment up to five carbon atoms, in another embodiment up to fourcarbon atoms, in another embodiment up to three carbon atoms, in anotherembodiment up to two carbon atoms, in another embodiment one carbonatom, are each replaced independently by O, S(O)_(q), N, P(O)_(r) or Si(and preferably O, S(O)_(q) or N). In one embodiment, however, the term“steroid” comprises species in which the “steroid basic skeleton”contains no heteroatoms.

A steroid ring system is numbered according to the convention set outbelow.

The term steroid encompasses sterols, steroid hormones, bile acids andsalts of bile acids. A sterol is any steroid with a hydroxyl group atthe 3-position of the A-ring.

Unsaturation

In accordance with standard use, the omega-3 position refers to thethird bond from the (methyl) terminal of the chain; the omega-6 positionrefers to the sixth bond from the (methyl) terminal of the chain and theomega-9 position refers to the ninth bond from the (methyl) terminal ofthe chain.

General

The practice of the present invention will employ, unless otherwiseindicated, conventional methods of chemistry, biochemistry, molecularbiology, immunology and pharmacology, within the skill of the art. Suchtechniques are explained fully in the literature. See, e.g., references33-39, etc.

The term “comprising” encompasses “including” as well as “consisting”e.g. a composition “comprising” X may consist exclusively of X or mayinclude something additional e.g. X+Y.

The term “about” in relation to a numerical value x is optional andmeans, for example, x±10%.

The word “substantially” does not exclude “completely” e.g. acomposition which is “substantially free” from Y may be completely freefrom Y. Where necessary, the word “substantially” may be omitted fromthe definition of the invention.

References to charge, to cations, to anions, to zwitterions, etc., aretaken at pH 7.

TLR3 is the Toll-like receptor 3. It is a single membrane-spanningreceptor which plays a key role in the innate immune system. Known TLR3agonists include poly(I:C). “TLR3” is the approved HGNC name for thegene encoding this receptor, and its unique HGNC ID is HGNC:11849. TheRefSeq sequence for the human TLR3 gene is GI:2459625.

TLR7 is the Toll-like receptor 7. It is a single membrane-spanningreceptor which plays a key role in the innate immune system. Known TLR7agonists include e.g. imiquimod. “TLR7” is the approved HGNC name forthe gene encoding this receptor, and its unique HGNC ID is HGNC:15631.The RefSeq sequence for the human TLR7 gene is GI:67944638.

TLR8 is the Toll-like receptor 8. It is a single membrane-spanningreceptor which plays a key role in the innate immune system. Known TLR8agonists include e.g. resiquimod. “TLR8” is the approved HGNC name forthe gene encoding this receptor, and its unique HGNC ID is HGNC:15632.The RefSeq sequence for the human TLR8 gene is GI:20302165.

The RIG-I-like receptor (“RLR”) family includes various RNA helicaseswhich play key roles in the innate immune system[40]. RLR-1 (also knownas RIG-I or retinoic acid inducible gene I) has two caspase recruitmentdomains near its N-terminus. The approved HGNC name for the geneencoding the RLR-1 helicase is “DDX58” (for DEAD (Asp-Glu-Ala-Asp) boxpolypeptide 58) and the unique HGNC ID is HGNC:19102. The RefSeqsequence for the human RLR-1 gene is GI:77732514. RLR-2 (also known asMDA5 or melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5) also has two caspaserecruitment domains near its N-terminus. The approved HGNC name for thegene encoding the RLR-2 helicase is “IFIH1” (for interferon induced withhelicase C domain 1) and the unique HGNC ID is HGNC:18873. The RefSeqsequence for the human RLR-2 gene is GI: 27886567. RLR-3 (also known asLGP2 or laboratory of genetics and physiology 2) has no caspaserecruitment domains. The approved HGNC name for the gene encoding theRLR-3 helicase is “DHX58” (for DEXH (Asp-Glu-X-His) box polypeptide 58)and the unique HGNC ID is HGNC:29517. The RefSeq sequence for the humanRLR-3 gene is GI:149408121.

PKR is a double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase. It plays a keyrole in the innate immune system. “EIF2AK2” (for eukaryotic translationinitiation factor 2-alpha kinase 2) is the approved HGNC name for thegene encoding this enzyme, and its unique HGNC ID is HGNC:9437. TheRefSeq sequence for the human PKR gene is GI:208431825.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a gel with stained RNA. Lanes show (1) markers (2) nakedreplicon (3) replicon after RNase treatment (4) replicon encapsulated inliposome (5) liposome after RNase treatment (6) liposome treated withRNase then subjected to phenol/chloroform extraction.

FIG. 2 is an electron micrograph of liposomes.

FIG. 3 shows protein expression (as relative light units, RLU) at days1, 3 and 6 after delivery of RNA in liposomes With PEGs of differentlengths: 1 kDa (triangles); 2 kDa (circles); 3 kDa (squares).

FIG. 4 shows a gel with stained RNA. Lanes show (1) markers (2) nakedreplicon (3 ) replicon encapsulated in liposome (4) liposome treatedwith RNase then subjected to phenol/chloroform extraction.

FIG. 5 shows protein expression at days 1, 3 and 6 after delivery of RNAas a virion-packaged replicon (squares), as naked RNA (diamonds), or inliposomes (+=0.1 μg,×=1 μg).

FIG. 6 shows protein expression at days 1, 3 and 6 after delivery offour different doses of liposome-encapsulated RNA.

FIG. 7 shows anti-F IgG titers in animals receiving virion-packagedreplicon (VRP or VSRP), naked RNA, and 1 μg liposome-encapsulated RNA.

FIG. 8 shows anti-F IgG titers in animals receiving VRP, 1 μg naked RNA,and 0.1 g or liposome-encapsulated RNA.

FIG. 9 shows neutralising antibody titers in animals receiving VRP oreither 0.1 g or 1 μg liposome-encapsulated RNA.

FIG. 10 shows expression levels after delivery of a replicon as nakedRNA (circles), liposome-encapsulated RNA (triangle & square), or as alipoplex (inverted triangle).

FIG. 11 shows F-specific IgG titers (2 weeks after second dose) afterdelivery of a replicon as naked RNA (0.01-1 μg), liposome-encapsulatedRNA (0.01-10μg), or packaged as a virion (VRP, 10⁶ infectious units orIU).

FIG. 12 shows F-specific IgG titers (circles) and PRNT titers (squares)after delivery of a replicon as naked RNA (1 μg), liposome-encapsulatedRNA (0.1 or 1 μg), or packaged as a virion (VRP, 10⁶ IU). Titers innaive mice are also shown. Solid lines show geometric means.

FIG. 13 shows intracellular cytokine production after restimulation withsynthetic peptides representing the major epitopes in the F protein, 4weeks after a second dose. The y-axis shows the % cytokine+ of CD8+CD4−.

FIG. 14 shows the structure of lipid “RV05”.

FIG. 15 shows F-specific IgG titers (mean log₁₀ titers±std dev) over 210days after immunisation of calves. The three lines are easilydistinguished at day 63 and are, from bottom to top: PBS negativecontrol; liposome-delivered RNA; and the “Triangle 4” product.

FIG. 16 shows structures of three PEG-conjugated DMG lipids (1-3 kDa).

FIGS. 17A to 17E show structures of various PEG-conjugated lipids, whereR is PEG of a desired length.

FIG. 18 shows the structure of a useful “split” PEG-conjugated lipid.The box shows the total MW of PEG in the lipid (which, in the specificexample below, was 2000).

MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

RNA Replicons

Various replicons are used below. In general these are based on a hybridalphavirus genome with non-structural proteins from venezuelan equineencephalitis virus (VEEV), a packaging signal from VEEV, and a 3′ UTRfrom Sindbis virus or a VEEV mutant. The replicon is about 10 kb longand has a poly-A tail.

Plasmid DNA encoding alphavirus replicons (named: pT7-mVEEV-FL.RSVF orA317; pT7-mVEEV-SEAP or A306; pSP6-VCR-GFP or A50) served as a templatefor synthesis of RNA in vitro. The replicons contain the alphavirusgenetic elements required for RNA replication but lack those encodinggene products necessary for particle assembly; the structural proteinsare instead replaced by a protein of interest (either a reporter, suchas SEAP or GFP, or an immunogen, such as full-length RSV F protein) andso the replicons are incapable of inducing the generation of infectiousparticles. A bacteriophage (T7 or SP6) promoter upstream of thealphavirus cDNA facilitates the synthesis of the replicon RNA in vitroand a hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribozyme immediately downstream of thepoly(A)-tail generates the correct 3′-end through its self-cleavingactivity.

Following linearization of the plasmid DNA downstream of the HDVribozyme with a suitable restriction endonuclease, run-off transcriptswere synthesized in vitro using T7 or SP6 bacteriophage derivedDNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Transcriptions were performed for 2 hoursat 37° C. in the presence of 7.5 mM (T7 RNA polymerase) or 5 mM (SP6 RNApolymerase) of each of the nucleoside triphosphates (ATP, CTP, GTP andUTP) following the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Ambion).Following transcription the template DNA was digested with TURBO DNase(Ambion). The replicon RNA was precipitated with LiCI and reconstitutedin nuclease-free water. Uncapped RNA was capped post-transcriptionallywith Vaccinia Capping Enzyme (VCE) using the ScriptCap m7G CappingSystem (Epicentre Biotechnologies) as outlined in the user manual;replicons capped in this way are given the “v” prefix e.g. vA317 is theA317 replicon capped by VCE. Post-transcriptionally capped RNA wasprecipitated with LiCl and reconstituted in nuclease-free water. Theconcentration of the RNA samples was determined by measuringOD_(260 nm). Integrity of the in vitro transcripts was confirmed bydenaturing agarose gel electrophoresis.

Liposomal Encapsulation

RNA was encapsulated in liposomes made essentially by the method ofreferences 7 and 41. The liposomes were made of 10% DSPC (zwitterionic),40% DlinDMA (cationic), 48% cholesterol and 2% PEG-conjugated DMG. Theseproportions refer to the % moles in the total liposome.

DlinDMA (1,2-dilinoleyloxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-aminopropane) was synthesizedusing the procedure of reference 2. DSPC(1,2-Diastearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) was purchased fromGenzyme. Cholesterol was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. PEG-conjugated DMG(1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethyleneglycol), ammonium salt), DOTAP(1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane, chloride salt) and DC-chol(3β-[N-(N′,N′-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoylicholesterol hydrochloride)were from Avanti Polar Lipids.

Briefly, lipids were dissolved in ethanol (2 ml), a RNA replicon wasdissolved in buffer (2 ml, 100 mM sodium citrate, pH 6) and these weremixed with 2 ml of buffer followed by 1 hour of equilibration.

The mixture was diluted with 6 ml buffer then filtered. The resultingproduct contained liposomes, with −95% encapsulation efficiency. FIG. 2shows an example electron micrograph of liposomes prepared by thesemethods. These liposomes contain encapsulated RNA encoding full-lengthRSV F antigen. Dynamic light scattering of one batch showed an averagediameter of 141 nm (by intensity) or 78 nm (by number).

In one particular encapsulation method, fresh lipid stock solutions inethanol were prepared. 37 mg of DlinDMA, 11.8 mg of DSPC, 27.8 mg ofCholesterol and 8.07 mg of PEG-conjugated DMG were weighed and dissolvedin 7.55 mL of ethanol. Five different conjugated PEGs were used:PEG-500, PEG-750, PEG-1000, PEG-2000 or PEG-3000. The freshly preparedlipid stock solution was gently rocked at 37° C. for about 15 min toform a homogenous mixture. Then, 226.7 μL of the stock was added to1.773 mL ethanol to make a working lipid stock solution of 2 mL. A 2 mLworking solution of RNA was also prepared from a stock solution of ˜1μg/μL in 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 6). Three 20 mL glass vials (withstir bars) were rinsed with RNase Away solution and washed with plentyof MilliQ water before use to decontaminate the vials of RNAses. One ofthe vials was used for the RNA working solution and the others forcollecting the lipid and RNA mixes (as described later). The workinglipid and RNA solutions were heated at 37° C. for 10 min before beingloaded into 3cc luer-lok syringes. 2 mL of citrate buffer (pH 6) wasloaded in another 3 cc syringe. Syringes containing RNA and the lipidswere connected to a T mixer (PEEK™ 500 μm ID junction) using FEPtubing(fluorinated ethylene-propylene; all FEP tubing used had a 2 mminternal diameter and a 3 mm outer diameter; obtained from Idex HealthScience). The outlet from the T mixer was also FEP tubing. The thirdsyringe containing the citrate buffer was connected to a separate pieceof tubing. All syringes were then driven at a flow rate of 7 mL/minusing a syringe pump. The tube outlets were positioned to collect themixtures in a 20 mL glass vial (while stirring). The stir bar was takenout and the ethanol/aqueous solution was allowed to equilibrate to roomtemperature for 1 hour. Then the mixture was loaded in a 5 cc syringe,which was fitted to a piece of FEP tubing and in another 5 cc syringewith equal length of FEP tubing, an equal volume of 100 mM citratebuffer (pH 6) was loaded. The two syringes were driven at 7 mL/min flowrate using a syringe pump and the final mixture collected in a 20 mLglass vial (while stirring). Next, liposomes were concentrated to 2 mLand dialyzed against 10-15 volumes of 1×PBS using a Tangential FlowFiltration (TFF) system before recovering the final product. The TFFsystem and hollow fiber filtration membranes were purchased fromSpectrum Labs and were used according to the manufacturer's guidelines.Hollow fiber filtration membranes with a 100 kD pore size cutoff and 20cm² surface area were used. For in vitro and in vivo experiments,formulations were diluted to the required RNA concentration with 1×PBS.

The percentage of encapsulated RNA and RNA concentration were determinedby Quant-iT RiboGreen RNA reagent kit (Invitrogen), followingmanufacturer's instructions. The ribosomal RNA standard provided in thekit was used to generate a standard curve. Liposomes were diluted 10× or100× in 1× TE buffer (from kit) before addition of the dye. Separately,liposomes were diluted 10× or 100× in 1× TE buffer containing 0.5%Triton X before addition of the dye (to disrupt the liposomes and thusto assay total RNA). Thereafter an equal amount of dye was added to eachsolution and then ˜180 μL of each solution after dye addition was loadedin duplicate into a 96 well tissue culture plate. The fluorescence (Ex485 nm, Em 528 nm) was read on a microplate reader. All liposomeformulations were dosed in vivo based on the encapsulated amount of RNA.

To obtain smaller liposomes the syringe/tube method was replaced by amethod in which the lipid and RNA solutions are mixed in channels on amicrofluidic chip. Fresh lipid stock solutions in ethanol were prepared.37 mg of DlinDMA, 11.8 mg of DSPC, 27.8 mg of cholesterol and 8.07 mg ofPEG-DMG were weighed and dissolved in 7.55 mL of ethanol. The freshlyprepared lipid stock solution was gently rocked at 37° C. for about 15min to form a homogenous mixture. Then, 226.7 μL of the stock was addedto 1.773 mL ethanol to make a working lipid stock solution of 2 mL. A 4mL working solution of RNA was also prepared from a stock solution of ˜1μ/μL in 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 6). Four 20 mL glass vials (with stirbars) were rinsed with RNase Away solution and washed with plenty ofMilliQ water before use to decontaminate the vials of RNAses. Two of thevials were used for the RNA working solution (2 mL in each vial) and theothers for collecting the lipid and RNA mixes. The working lipid and RNAsolutions were heated at 37° C. for 10 min before being loaded into 3ccluer-lok syringes. Syringes containing RNA and the lipids were connectedto a Mitos Droplet junction Chip (a glass microfluidic device obtainedfrom Syrris, Part no. 3000158) using PTFE tubing 0.03 inches ID× 1/16inch OD, (Syrris) using a 4-way edge connector. Two RNA streams and onelipid stream were driven by syringe pumps and the mixing of the ethanoland aqueous phase was done at the X junction (100 μm×105 μm) of thechip. The flow rate of all three streams was kept at 1.5 ml/min, hencethe ratio of total aqueous to ethanolic flow rate was 2:1. The tubeoutlet was positioned to collect the mixtures in a 20 mL glass vial(while stirring). The stir bar was taken out and the ethanol/aqueoussolution was allowed to equilibrate to room temperature for 1 hour. Thenthe mixture was loaded in a 5 cc syringe which was fitted to a piece ofPTFE tubing 0.03 inches ID x 1/16 inches OD and in another 5 cc syringewith equal length of PTFE tubing, an equal volume of 100 mM citratebuffer (pH 6) was loaded. The two syringes were driven at 3 mllmin flowrate using a syringe pump and the final mixture collected in a 20 mLglass vial (while stirring). Next, liposomes were concentrated to 2 mLand dialyzed against 10-15 volumes of 1×PBS using the TFF system beforerecovering the final product. Hollow fiber filtration membranes with a100 kDa pore size cutoff and 20 cm² surface area were used. For in vitroand in vivo experiments, formulations were diluted to the required RNAconcentration with 1×PBS. Whereas liposomes prepared using thesyringe/tube method with 75 μg RNA had a Z-average diameter (Zav) of 148nm and a polydispersity index (pdI) of 0.122, the chip mixing gaveliposomes with a Zav of 97 nm and a pdI of 0.086. The proportion ofencapsulated RNA decreased slightly from 90% to 87%.

Encapsulation in liposomes was shown to protect RNA from RNasedigestion. Experiments used 3.8 mAU of RNase A per microgram of RNA,incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. RNase was inactivated withProteinase K at 55° C. for 10 minutes. A 1:1 v/v mixture of sample to25:24:1 v/v/v, phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol was then added toextract the RNA from the lipids into the aqueous phase. Samples weremixed by vortexing for a few seconds and then placed on a centrifuge for15 minutes at 12 k RPM. The aqueous phase (containing the RNA) wasremoved and used to analyze the RNA. Prior to loading (400 ng RNA perwell) all the samples were incubated with formaldehyde loading dye,denatured for 10 minutes at 65° C. and cooled to room temperature.Ambion Millennium markers were used to approximate the molecular weightof the RNA construct. The gel was run at 90 V. The gel was stained using0.1% SYBR gold according to the manufacturer's guidelines in water byrocking at room temperature for 1 hour. FIG. 1 shows that RNasecompletely digests RNA in the absence of encapsulation (lane 3). RNA isundetectable after encapsulation (lane 4), and no change is seen ifthese liposomes are treated with RNase (lane 4). After RNase-treatedliposomes are subjected to phenol extraction, undigested RNA is seen(lane 6). Even after 1 week at 4° C. the RNA could be seen without anyfragmentation (FIG. 4, arrow). Protein expression in vivo was unchangedafter 6 weeks at 4° C. and one freeze-thaw cycle. Thusliposome-encapsulated RNA is stable.

To assess in vivo expression of the RNA a reporter enzyme (SEAP;secreted alkaline phosphatase) was encoded in the replicon, rather thanan immunogen. Expression levels were measured in sera diluted 1:4 in1×Phospha-Light dilution buffer using a chemiluminescent alkalinephosphate substrate. 8-10 week old BALB/c mice (5/group) were injectedintramuscularly on day 0, 50 μl per leg with 0.1 μg or 1 μg RNA dose.The same vector was also administered without the liposomes (in RNasefree 1X PBS) at 1 μg. Virion-packaged replicons were also tested.Virion-packaged replicons used herein (referred to as “VRPs”) wereobtained by the methods of reference 42, where the alphavirus repliconis derived from the mutant VEEV or a chimera derived from the genome ofVEEV engineered to contain the 3′ UTR of Sindbis virus and a Sindbisvirus packaging signal (PS), packaged by co-electroporating them intoBHK cells with defective helper RNAs encoding the Sindbis virus capsidand glycoprotein genes.

As shown in FIG. 5, encapsulation increased SEAP levels by about ½ logat the 1 μg dose, and at day 6 expression from a 0.1 μg encapsulateddose matched levels seen with 1 μg unencapsulated dose. By day 3expression levels exceeded those achieved with VRPs (squares). Thusexpressed increased when the RNA was formulated in the liposomesrelative to the naked RNA control, even at a 10× lower dose. Expressionwas also higher relative to the VRP control, but the kinetics ofexpression were very different (see FIG. 5). Delivery of the RNA withelectroporation resulted in increased expression relative to the nakedRNA control, but these levels were lower than with liposomes.

To assess whether the effect seen in the liposome groups was due merelyto the liposome components, or was linked to the encapsulation, thereplicon was administered in encapsulated form (with two differentpurification protocols, 0.1 μg RNA), or mixed with the liposomes aftertheir formation (a non-encapsulated “lipoplex”, 0.1 μg RNA), or as nakedRNA (1μg). FIG. 10 shows that the lipoplex gave the lowest levels ofexpression, showing that shows encapsulation is essential for potentexpression.

Further SEAP experiments showed a clear dose response in vivo, withexpression seen after delivery of as little as ing RNA (FIG. 6). Furtherexperiments comparing expression from encapsulated and naked repliconsindicated that 0.01 μg encapsulated RNA was equivalent to 1 μg of nakedRNA. At a 0.5 μg dose of RNA the encapsulated material gave a 12-foldhigher expression at day 6; at a 0.1 μg dose levels were 24-fold higherat day 6.

Rather than looking at average levels in the group, individual animalswere also studied. Whereas several animals were non-responders to nakedreplicons, encapsulation eliminated non-responders.

Further experiments replaced DIinDMA with DOTAP. Although the DOTAPliposomes gave better expression than naked replicon, they were inferiorto the DlinDMA liposomes (2- to 3-fold difference at day 1).

To assess in vivo immunogenicity a replicon was constructed to expressfull-length F protein from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This wasdelivered naked (lpg), encapsulated in liposomes (0.1 or 1 μg), orpackaged in virions (10⁶ IU; “VRP”) at days 0 and 21. FIG. 7 showsanti-F IgG titers 2 weeks after the second dose, and the liposomesclearly enhance immunogenicity. FIG. 8 shows titers 2 weeks later, bywhich point there was no statistical difference between the encapsulatedRNA at 0.1 μg, the encapsulated RNA at 1μg, or the VRP group.Neutralisation titers (measured as 60% plaque reduction, “PRNT60”) werenot significantly different in these three groups 2 weeks after thesecond dose (FIG. 9). FIG. 12 shows both IgG and PRNT titers 4 weeksafter the second dose.

FIG. 13 confirms that the RNA elicits a robust CD8 T cell response.

Further experiments compared F-specific IgG titers in mice receivingVRP, 0.1 μg liposome-encapsulated RNA, or 1 μg liposome-encapsulatedRNA. Titer ratios (VRP: liposome) at various times after the second dosewere as follows:

2 weeks 4 weeks 8 weeks 0.1 μg 2.9 1.0 1.1   1 μg 2.3 0.9 0.9

Thus the liposome-encapsulated RNA induces essentially the samemagnitude of immune response as seen with virion delivery.

Further experiments showed superior F-specific IgG responses with a 10μg dose, equivalent responses for 1 μg and 0.1 μg doses, and a lowerresponse with a 0.01 μg dose. FIG. 11 shows IgG titers in mice receivingthe replicon in naked form at 3 different doses, in liposomes at 4different doses, or as VRP (10⁶ IU). The response seen with 1 μgliposome-encapsulated RNA was statistically insignificant (ANOVA) whencompared to VRP, but the higher response seen with 10 μgliposome-encapsulated RNA was statistically significant (p<0.05) whencompared to both of these groups.

A further study confirmed that the 0.1 μg of liposome-encapsulated RNAgave much higher anti-F

IgG responses (15 days post-second dose) than 0.1 μg of delivered DNA,and even was more immunogenic than 20 μg plasmid DNA encoding the Fantigen, delivered by electroporation (Elgen™ DNA Delivery System,Inovio).

Liposome Manufacturing Methods

In general, eight different methods have been used for preparingliposomes according to the invention. These are referred to in the textas methods (A) to (H) and they differ mainly in relation to filtrationand TFF steps. Details are as follows:

-   -   (A) Fresh lipid stock solutions in ethanol were prepared. 37 mg        of DlinDMA, 11.8 mg of DSPC, 27.8 mg of Cholesterol and 8.07 mg        of PEG DMG 2000 were weighed and dissolved in 7.55 mL of        ethanol. The freshly prepared lipid stock solution was gently        rocked at 37° C. for about 15 min to form a homogenous mixture.        Then, 755 μL of the stock was added to 1.245 mL ethanol to make        a working lipid stock solution of 2 mL. This amount of lipids        was used to form liposomes with 250 μg RNA. A 2 mL working        solution of RNA was also prepared from a stock solution of ˜1        μg/μL in 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 6). Three 20 mL glass vials        (with stir bars) were rinsed with RNase Away solution (Molecular        BioProducts, San Diego, Calif.) and washed with plenty of MilliQ        water before use to decontaminate the vials of RNases. One of        the vials was used for the RNA working solution and the others        for collecting the lipid and RNA mixes (as described later). The        working lipid and RNA solutions were heated at 37° C. for 10 min        before being loaded into 3 cc luer-lok syringes. 2 mL of citrate        buffer (pH 6) was loaded in another 3 cc syringe. Syringes        containing RNA and the lipids were connected to a T mixer (PEEK™        500 μm ID junction, Idex Health Science, Oak Harbor, Wash.)        using FEP tubing (fluorinated ethylene-propylene; al FEP tubing        has a 2 mm internal diameter×3 mm outer diameter, supplied by        Idex Health Science). The outlet from the T mixer was also FEP        tubing. The third syringe containing the citrate buffer was        connected to a separate piece of FEP tubing. All syringes were        then driven at a flow rate of 7 mL/min using a syringe pump. The        tube outlets were positioned to collect the mixtures in a 20 mL        glass vial (while stirring). The stir bar was taken out and the        ethanol/aqueous solution was allowed to equilibrate to room        temperature for 1 hour. 4 ml of the mixture was loaded into a 5        cc syringe, which was connected to a piece of FEP tubing and in        another 5 cc syringe connected to an equal length of FEP tubing,        an equal amount of 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 6) was loaded. The        two syringes were driven at 7 mL/min flow rate using the syringe        pump and the final mixture collected in a 20 mL glass vial        (while stirring). Next, the mixture collected from the second        mixing step (liposomes) were passed through a Mustang Q membrane        (an anion-exchange support that binds and removes anionic        molecules, obtained from Pall Corporation, AnnArbor, Mich.,        USA). Before passing the liposomes, 4 mL of 1 M NaOH, 4 mL of 1        M NaCl and 10 mL of 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 6) were        successively passed through the Mustang membrane. Liposomes were        warmed for 10 min at 37° C. before passing through the membrane.        Next, liposomes were concentrated to 2 mL and dialyzed against        10-15 volumes of 1×PBS using TFF before recovering the final        product. The TFF system and hollow fiber filtration membranes        were purchased from Spectrum Labs and were used according to the        manufacturer's guidelines. Polysulfone hollow fiber filtration        membranes (part number P/N: XlAB-100-20P) with a 100 kD pore        size cutoff and 8 cm² surface area were used. For in vitro and        in vivo experiments, formulations were diluted to the required        RNA concentration with 1×PBS.    -   (B) As method (A) except that, after rocking, 226.7 μL of the        stock was added to 1.773 mL ethanol to make a working lipid        stock solution of 2 mL, thus modifying the lipid:RNA ratio.    -   (C) As method (B) except that the Mustang filtration was        omitted, so liposomes went from the 20 mL glass vial into the        TFF dialysis.    -   (D) As method (C) except that the TFF used polyethersulfone        (PES) hollow fiber membranes (part number P-C1-100E-100-01N)        with a 100 kD pore size cutoff and 20 cm² surface area.    -   (E) As method (D) except that a Mustang membrane was used, as in        method (A).    -   (F) As method (A) except that the Mustang filtration was        omitted, so liposomes went from the 20 mL glass vial into the        TFF dialysis.    -   (G) As method (D) except that a 4 mL working solution of RNA was        prepared from a stock solution of ˜1 μg/μL in 100 mM citrate        buffer (pH 6). Then four 20 mL glass vials were prepared in the        same way. Two of them were used for the RNA working solution (2        mL in each vial) and the others for collecting the lipid and RNA        mixes, as in (C). Rather than use T mixer, syringes containing        RNA and the lipids were connected to a Mitos Droplet junction        Chip (a glass microfluidic device obtained from Syrris, Part        no. 3000158) using PTFE tubing (0.03 inches internal diameter x        1/16 inch outer diameter) using a 4-way edge connector (Syrris).        Two RNA streams and one lipid stream were driven by syringe        pumps and the mixing of the ethanol and aqueous phase was done        at the X junction (100 μm×105 pm) of the chip. The flow rate of        all three streams was kept at 1.5 mL/min, hence the ratio of        total aqueous to ethanolic flow rate was 2:1. The tube outlet        was positioned to collect the mixtures in a 20 mL glass vial        (while stirring). The stir bar was taken out and the        ethanol/aqueous solution was allowed to equilibrate to room        temperature for 1 h. Then the mixture was loaded in a 5 cc        syringe, which was fitted to another piece of the PTFE tubing;        in another 5 cc syringe with equal length of PTFE tubing, an        equal volume of 100 mM citrate buffer (pH 6) was loaded. The two        syringes were driven at 3 mL/min flow rate using a syringe pump        and the final mixture collected in a 20 mL glass vial (while        stirring). Next, liposomes were concentrated to 2 mL and        dialyzed against 10-15 volumes of 1X PBS using TFF, as in (D).    -   (H) As method (A) except that the 2 mL working lipid stock        solution was made by mixing 120.9 μL of the lipid stock with        1.879 mL ethanol. Also, after mixing in the T mixer the        liposomes from the 20 mL vial were loaded into Pierce        Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis Cassette (Thermo Scientific, extra        strength, 0.5-3 mL capacity) and dialyzed against 400-500 mL of        1X PBS overnight at 4° C. in an autoclaved plastic container        before recovering the final product.

RSV Immunogenicity

The vA317 self-replicating replicon encoding RSV F protein wasadministered to BALB/c mice, 4 or 8 animals per group, by bilateralintramuscular vaccinations (50 μL per leg) on days 0 and 21 with thereplicon (1 μg) alone or formulated as liposomes with DlinDMA (“RV01”)or DOTAP (“RV13”) or the lipid shown in FIG. 14 (“RV05”). The RV01liposomes had 40% DlinDMA, 10% DSPC, 48% cholesterol and 2% PEG-DMG, butwith differing amounts of RNA. The RV05 liposomes had either 40% RV05,10% DSPC, 48% cholesterol and 2% PEG-DMG or 60% RV05, 38% cholesteroland 2% PEG-DMG. The RV13 liposomes had 40% DOTAP, 10% DOPE, 48%cholesterol and 2% PEG-DMG. In all cases the PEG was PEG-2000 (i.e. 2kDa PEG). For comparison, naked plasmid DNA (20 μg) expressing the sameRSV-F antigen was delivered either using electroporation or withRV01(10) liposomes (0.1 μg DNA). Four mice were used as a naïve controlgroup.

Liposomes were prepared by method (A) or method (B). For some liposomesmade by method (A) a double or half amount of RNA was used. Z averageparticle diameter and polydispersity index were:

RV Zav (nm) pdI Preparation RV01 (10) 158.6 0.088 (A) RV01 (08) 156.80.144 (A) RV01 (05) 136.5 0.136 (B) RV01 (09) 153.2 0.067 (A) RV01 (10)134.7 0.147 (A) RV05 (01) 148 0.127 (A) RV05 (02) 177.2 0.136 (A) RV13(02) 128.3 0.179 (A)

Serum was collected for antibody analysis on days 14, 36 and 49. Spleenswere harvested from mice at day 49 for T cell analysis.

F-specific serum IgG titers (GMT) were as follows:

RV Day 14 Day 36 Naked DNA plasmid 439 6712 Naked A317 RNA 78 2291 RV01(10) 3020 26170 RV01 (08) 2326 9720 RV01 (05) 5352 54907 RV01 (09) 442851316 RV05 (01) 1356 5346 RV05 (02) 961 6915 RV01 (10) DNA 5 13 RV13(02) 644 3616

The proportion of T cells which are cytokine-positive and specific forRSV F51-66 peptide are as follows, showing only figures which arestatistically significantly above zero:

CD4+ CD8− CD4− CD8+ RV IFNγ IL2 IL5 TNFα IFNγ IL2 IL5 TNFα Naked DNAplasmid 0.04 0.07 0.10 0.57 0.29 0.66 Naked A317 RNA 0.04 0.05 0.08 0.570.23 0.67 RV01 (10) 0.07 0.10 0.13 1.30 0.59 1.32 RV01 (08) 0.02 0.040.06 0.46 0.30 0.51 RV01 (05) 0.08 0.12 0.15 1.90 0.68 1.94 RV01 (09)0.06 0.08 0.09 1.62 0.67 1.71 RV01 (10) DNA 0.03 0.08 RV13 (02) 0.030.04 0.06 1.15 0.41 1.18

Thus the liposome formulations significantly enhanced immunogenicityrelative to the naked RNA controls, as determined by increasedF-specific IgG titers and T cell frequencies. Plasmid DNA formulatedwith liposomes, or delivered naked using electroporation, wassignificantly less immunogenic than liposome-formulated self-replicatingRNA.

Further RV01 liposomes were prepared by method (H), again using 2 kDaPEG conjugated to DMG, and either encapsulating 150 μg RNA (vA375replicon encoding surface fusion glycoprotein of RSV) or encapsulatingonly buffer. Thus these liposomes had 40% DlinDMA, 10% DSPC, 48% Chol,and 2% PEG-DMG. Sizes and encapsulation were as follows:

RV Zav (nm) pdI RNA Encapsulat^(n) RV01 (36) 152.1 0.053 + 92.5% RV01(36) 144 0.13 − —

The liposomes were administered to BALB/c mice (10 per group) bybilateral intramuscular injection (50 μl per leg) on days 0 & 21. Doseswere 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3 or 1 μg. F-specific serum IgG and PRNT60titers (GMT) were as follows, 2 weeks after the first or secondinjection:

RV RNA (μg) 2wp1 2wp2 PRNT60 (2wp2) Buffer control 0 — — 10 RV01 (36) 0— — 10 RV01 (36) 0.01 3399 50691 37 RV01 (36) 0.03 3446 53463 83 RV01(36) 0.1 8262 76808 238 RV01 (36) 0.3 5913 82599 512 RV01 (36) 1 821385138 441

Cytomegalovirus Immunogenicity

RV01 liposomes with DLinDMA as the cationic lipid and 2 kDa PEG wereused to deliver RNA replicons encoding CMV glycoproteins. The “vA160”replicon encodes full-length glycoproteins H and L (gH/gL), whereas the“vA322” replicon encodes a soluble form (gHsol/gL). The two proteins areunder the control of separate subgenomic promoters in a single replicon;co-administration of two separate vectors, one encoding gH and oneencoding gL, did not give good results.

BALB/c mice, 10 per group, were given bilateral intramuscularvaccinations (50 μL per leg) on days 0, 21 and 42 with VRPs expressinggH/gL (1×10⁶ IU), VRPs expressing gHsol/gL (1×10⁶ IU) and PBS as thecontrols. Two test groups received 1 μg of the vA160 or vA322 repliconformulated in liposomes (40% DlinDMA, 10% DSPC, 48% Chol, 2% PEG-DMG;made using method (D) but with 150 μg RNA batch size).

The vA160 liposomes had a Zav diameter of 168.8 nm, a pdI of 0.144, and87.4% encapsulation. The vA322 liposomes had a Zav diameter of 162 nm, apdI of 0.131, and 90% encapsulation.

The replicons were able to express two proteins from a single vector.

Sera were collected for immunological analysis on day 63 (3wp3). CMVneutralization titers (the reciprocal of the serum dilution producing a50% reduction in number of positive virus foci per well, relative tocontrols) were as follows:

gH/gL VRP gHsol/gL VRP gH/gL liposome gHsol/gL liposome 4576 2393 424010062

RNA expressing either a full-length or a soluble form of the CMV gH/gLcomplex thus elicited high titers of neutralizing antibodies, as assayedon epithelial cells. The average titers elicited by theliposome-encapsulated RNAs were at least as high as for thecorresponding VRPs.

Repeat experiments confirmed that the replicon was able to express twoproteins from a single vector. The RNA replicon gave a 3wp3 titer of11457, compared to 5516 with VRPs.

Expression Kinetics

A self-replicating RNA replicon (“vA311”) that expresses a luciferasereporter gene (luc) was used for studying the kinetics of proteinexpression after injection. BALB/c mice, 5 animals per group, receivedbilateral intramuscular vaccinations (50 μL per leg) on day 0 with:

-   -   Group 1 DNA expressing luciferase, delivered using        electroporation (10 μg) Group 2 self-replicating RNA (1 μg)        formulated in liposomes (40% DlinDMA, 10% DSPC, 48% cholesterol,        2% PEG-2000 conjugated to DMG    -   Group 3 self-replicating RNA (1 μg) formulated with a cationic        nanoemulsion (CNE17) Group 4 self-replicating RNA (1μg)        formulated with a different cationic nanoemulsion    -   Group 5 VRP (1x10⁶ IU) expressing luciferase

Prior to vaccination mice were depilated. Mice were anesthetized (2%isoflurane in oxygen), hair was first removed with an electric razor andthen chemical Nair. Bioluminescence data was then acquired using aXenogen IVIS 200 imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences) on days 3, 7,14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 63 and 70. Five minutes prior to imaging micewere injected intraperitbneally with 8 mg/kg of luciferin solution.Animals were then anesthetized and transferred to the imaging system.Image acquisition times were kept constant as bioluminescence signal wasmeasured with a cooled CCD camera.

In visual terms, luciferase-expressing cells were seen to remainprimarily at the site of RNA injection, and animals imaged after removalof quads showed no signal.

In quantitative terms, luciferase expression was measured as averageradiance over a period of 70 days (p/s/cm²/sr), and results were asfollows for the 5 groups:

Days 1 2 3 4 5 3 8.69E+07 3.33E+06 2.11E+06 9.71E+06 1.46E+07 7 1.04E+088.14E+06 1.83E+07 5.94E+07 1.64E+07 14 8.16E+07 2.91E+06 9.22E+063.48E+07 8.49E+05 21 1.27E+07 3.13E+05 6.79E+04 5.07E+05 6.79E+05 281.42E+07 6.37E+05 2.36E+04 4.06E+03 2.00E+03 35 1.21E+07 6.12E+052.08E+03 42 1.49E+07 8.70E+05 49 1.17E+07 2.04E+05 63 9.69E+06 1.72E+0370 9.29E+06

The self-replicating RNA formulated with cationic nanoemulsions showedmeasurable bioluminescence at day 3, which peaked at day 7 and thenreduced to background levels by days 28 , to 35. When formulated inliposomes the RNA showed measurable bioluminescence at day 3, whichpeaked at day 7 and reduced to background levels by day 63. RNAdelivered using VRPs showed enhanced bioluminescence at day 21 whencompared to the formulated RNA, but expression had reduced to backgroundlevels by day 28. Electroporated DNA showed the highest level ofbioluminescence at all time points measured and levels ofbioluminescence did not reduce to background levels within the 70 daysof the experiment.

Delivery Volume

Hydrodynamic delivery employs the force generated by the rapid injectionof a large volume of solution to overcome the physical barriers of cellmembranes which prevent large and membrane-impermeable compounds fromentering cells. This phenomenon has previously been shown to be usefulfor the intracellular delivery of DNA vaccines.

A typical mouse delivery volume for intramuscular injection is 50 μlinto the hind leg, which is a relatively high volume for a mouse legmuscle. In contrast, a human intramuscular dose of ˜0.5 ml is relativelysmall. If immunogenicity in mice would be volume-dependent then thereplicon vaccines' efficacy might be due, at least in part, onhydrodynamic forces, which would not be encouraging for use of the samevaccines in humans and larger animals.

The vA317 replicon was delivered to BALB/c mice, 10 per group, bybilateral intramuscular vaccinations (5 or 50 per leg) on day 0 and 21:

-   -   Group 1 received naked replicon, 0.2.tg in 50 μL per leg    -   Group 2 received naked replicon, 0.2 μg in 5 μL. per leg    -   Group 3 received emulsion-formulated replicon (0.2 μg, 50 μL per        leg)    -   Group 4 received emulsion-formulated replicon (0.2 μg, 5 μL per        leg)    -   Group 5 received liposome-formulated replicon (0.2 μg, 50 μL per        leg)    -   Group 6 received liposome-formulated replicon (0.2 μg, 5 μL per        leg)

The liposomes for groups 5 & 6 were 40% DlinDMA, 10% DSPC, 48%cholesterol, and 2% PEG-2000 conjugated to DMG.

Serum was collected for antibody analysis on days 14 and 35. F-specificserum IgG GMTs were:

Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 14 42 21 783 760 2669 2610 35 241 154 2316 2951 1765518516

Thus immunogenicity of the formulated replicon did not vary according tothe delivered volume, thus indicating that these RNA vaccines do notrely on hydrodynamic delivery for their efficacy.

Cotton Rats

A study was performed in cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidis) instead ofmice. At a 1 μg dose liposome encapsulation increased F-specific IgGtiters by 8.3-fold compared to naked RNA and increased PRNT titers by9.5-fold. The magnitude of the antibody response was equivalent to thatinduced by 5×10⁶ IU VRP. Both naked and liposome-encapsulated RNA wereable to protect the cotton rats from RSV challenge (1×10⁵ plaque formingunits), reducing lung viral load by at least 3.5 logs. Encapsulationincreased the reduction by about 2-fold.

Further work in cotton rats used four different replicons: vA317expresses full-length RSV-F; vA318 expresses truncated (transmembraneand cytoplasmic tail removed) RSV-F; vA142 expresses RSV-F with itsfusion peptide deleted; vA140 expresses the truncated RSV-F also withoutits peptide. Cotton rats, 4 to 8 animals per group, were givenintramuscular vaccinations (100 μL, in one leg) on days 0 and 21 withthe four different replicons at two doses (1.0 and 0.1μg) formulated inliposomes made using 2 kDa PEG-conjugated DMG by method (D), but with a150 μg RNA batch size. Control groups received a RSV-F subunit proteinvaccine (5 μg) adjuvanted with alum (8 animals/group), VRPs expressingfull-length RSV-F (1×10⁶ IU, 8 animals/group), or naive control (4animals/group). Serum was collected for antibody analysis on days 0, 21and 34.

F-specific serum IgG titers and RSV serum neutralizing antibody titerson day 21 and 34 were:

IgG, IgG, NT, NT, Group day 21 day 34 day 21 day 34 1 μg vA317 915 2249115 459 0.1 μg vA317 343 734 87 95 1 μg vA318 335 1861 50 277 0.1 μgvA318 129 926 66 239 1 μg vA142 778 4819 92 211 0.1 μg vA142 554 2549 78141 1 μg vA140 182 919 96 194 0.1 μg vA140 61 332 29 72 5 μg F trimersubunit/alum 13765 86506 930 4744 1 × 10⁶ IU VRP-F full 1877 19179 1044528 Naïve 5 5 10 15

All four replicons evaluated in this study (vA317, vA318, vA142, vA140)were immunogenic in cotton rats when delivered by liposome, althoughserum neutralization titers were at least ten-fold lower than thoseinduced by adjuvanted protein vaccines or by VRPs. The liposome/RNAvaccines elicited serum F-specific IgG and RSV neutralizing antibodiesafter the first vaccination, and a second vaccination boosted theresponse effectively. F-specific IgG titers after the second vaccinationwith 1 μg replicon were 2- to 3-fold higher than after the secondvaccination with 0.1 μg replicon. The four replicons elicited comparableantibody titers, suggesting that full length and truncated RSV-F, eachwith or without the fusion peptide, are similarly immunogenic in cottonrats.

Further work in cotton rats again used the vA317, vA318 and vA142replicons. Cotton rats, 2-8 animals per group, were given intramuscularvaccinations (100 μL in one leg) on days 0 and 21 with the replicons(0.1 or 1 μg) encapsulated in RV01 liposomes (with PEG-2000) made bymethod (D) but with a 150 μg RNA batch size. Control groups received theRSV-F subunit protein vaccine (5 μg) adjuvanted with alum or VRPsexpressing full-length RSV-F (1×10⁶ IU, 8 animals/group). All theseanimals received a third vaccination (day 56) with RSV-F subunit proteinvaccine (5 μg) adjuvanted with alum. In addition there was a naïvecontrol (4 animals/group). In addition, an extra group was givenbilateral intramuscular vaccinations (50 μL per leg) on days 0 and 56with 1 μg vA317 RNA in liposomes but did not receive a third vaccinationwith the subunit protein vaccine.

Serum was collected for antibody analysis on days 0, 21, 35, 56, 70,plus days 14, 28 & 42 for the extra group. F-specific serum IgG titers(GMT) were as follows:

Day 21 Day 35 Day 56 Day 70 1 μg vA318 260 1027 332 14263 0.1 μg vA31895 274 144 2017 1 μg vA142 483 1847 1124 11168 0.1 μg vA142 314 871 41811023 1 μg vA317 841 4032 1452 13852 1 × 10⁶ VRP (F-full) 2075 3938 159614574 5 μg F trimer subunit/alum 12685 54526 25846 48864 Naïve 5 5 5 5

Serum neutralisation titers were as follows (60% RSV neutralizationtiters for 2 pools of 3-4 animals per group, GMT of these 2 pools pergroup):

Day 21 Day 35 Day 56 Day 70 1 μg vA318 58 134 111 6344 0.1 μg vA318 41102 63 6647 1 μg vA142 77 340 202 5427 0.1 μg vA142 35 65 56 2223 1 μgvA317 19 290 200 4189 1 × 10⁶ VRP (F-full) 104 1539 558 2876 5 μg Ftrimer subunit/alum 448 4457 1630 3631 Naïve 10 10 10

Serum titers and neutralising titers for the extra group were asfollows:

Day 14 21 28 35 42 56 70 IgG 397 561 535 501 405 295 3589 NT 52 82 90106 80 101 1348

Thus the replicons are confirmed as immunogenic in cotton rats,eliciting serum F-specific IgG and RSV neutralizing antibodies after thefirst vaccination. A second vaccination boosted the responseseffectively. F-specific IgG titers after the second vaccination with 1.0μg replicon were 1.5 to 4-fold higher than after the second vaccinationwith 0.1 μg replicon.

The third vaccination (protein at day 56) did not boost titers in cottonrats previously vaccinated with F trimer subunit+alum, but it didprovide a large boost to titers in cotton rats previously vaccinatedwith replicon. In most cases the RSV serum neutralization titers aftertwo replicon vaccinations followed by protein boost were equal to orgreater than titers induced by two or three sequential proteinvaccinations.

This study also evaluated the kinetics of the antibody response to 1.0μg vA317. F-specific serum IgG and RSV neutralization titers induced bya single vaccination reached their peak around day 21 and weremaintained through at least day 56 (50-70% drop in F-specific IgG titer,little change in RSV neutralization titer). A homologous secondvaccination was given to these animals on day 56, and boosted antibodytiters to a level at least equal to that achieved when the secondvaccination was administered on day 21.

Further experiments involved a viral challenge. The vA368 repliconencodes the full-length wild type surface fusion glycoprotein of RSVwith the fusion peptide deleted, with expression driven by the EV71IRES. Cotton rats, 7 per group, were given intramuscular vaccinations(100 μL per leg) on days 0 and 21 with vA368 in liposomes prepared bymethod (H), 175 μg RNA batch size, or with VRPs having the samereplicon. The liposomes included 2 kDa PEG, conjugated to DMG. A controlgroup received 5 μg alum-adjuvanted protein, and a naïve control groupwas also included.

All groups received an intranasal challenge (i.n.) with 1×10⁶ PFU RSVfour weeks after the final immunization. Serum was collected forantibody analysis on days 0, 21, 35. Viral lung titers were measured 5days post challenge. Results were as follows:

Liposome VRP Protein Naïve F-specific Serum IgG titers (GMT) Day 21 3701017 28988 5 Day 35 2636 2002 113843 5 Neutralising titers (GMT) Day 2147 65 336 10 Day 35 308 271 5188 10 Lung viral load (pfu per gram oflung) Day 54 422 225 124 694110

Thus the RNA vaccine reduced the lung viral load by over three logs,from approximately 10⁶ PFU/g in unvaccinated control cotton rats to lessthan 10³ PFU/g in vaccinated cotton rats.

Large Mammal Study

A large-animal study was performed in cattle. Calves (4-6 weeks old,˜60-80 kg, 5 per group) were immunised with 66 μg of replicon vA317encoding full-length RSV F protein at days 0, 21, 86 and 146. Thereplicons were formulated inside liposomes made by method (E) but with a1.5 mg RNA batch size; they had 40% DlinDMA, 10% DSPC, 48% cholesterol,and 2% PEG-2000 conjugated to DMG. PBS alone was used as a negativecontrol, and a licensed vaccine was used as a positive control(“Triangle 4” from Fort Dodge, containing killed virus). All calvesreceived 15 μg F protein adjuvanted with the MF59 emulsion on day 146.

The RNA vaccines encoded human RSV F whereas the “Triangle 4” vaccinecontains bovine RSV F, but the RSV F protein is highly conserved betweenBRSV and HRSV.

Calves received 2 ml of each experimental vaccine, administeredintramuscularly as 2×1 ml on each side of the neck. In contrast, the“Triangle 4” vaccine was given as a single 2 ml dose in the neck.

Serum was collected for antibody analysis on days 0, 14, 21, 35, 42, 56,63, 86, 100, 107, 114, 121, 128, 135, 146, 160, 167, 174, 181, 188, 195,and 202. If an individual animal had a titer below the limit ofdetection it was assigned a titer of 5.

FIG. 15 shows F-specific IgG titers over 210 days. Over the first 63days the RNA replicon was immunogenic in the cows via liposomes,although it gave lower titers than the licensed vaccine. All vaccinatedcows showed F-specific antibodies after the second dose, and titers werevery stable from the period of 2 to 6 weeks after the second dose (andwere particularly stable for the RNA vaccines). Titres up to day 202were as follows:

3wp1 2wp2 5wp2 ~9wp2 2wp3 5wp3 8wp3 2wp4 5wp4 8wp4 D0 D21 D35 D56 D86D100 D121 D146 D160 D181 D202 PBS 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 46 98 150 Liposome 5 512 11 20 768 428 74 20774 7022 2353 Triangle 4 5 5 1784 721 514 34062786 336 13376 4775 2133

RSV serum neutralizing antibody titers were as follows:

2wp2 5wp2 2wp3 3wp3 4wp3 8wp3 2wp4 3wp4 4wp4 D0 D35 D56 D100 D107 D114D146 D160 D167 D174 PBS 12 10 10 14 18 20 14 10 10 10 Liposome 13 10 1020 13 17 13 47 26 21 Triangle 4 12 15 13 39 38 41 13 24 26 15

The material used for the second liposome dose was not freshly prepared,and the same lot of RNA showed a decrease in potency in a mouseimmunogenicity study. Therefore it is possible that the vaccine wouldhave been more immunogenic if fresh material had been used for allvaccinations.

When assayed with complement, neutralizing antibodies were detected inall vaccinated cows. In this assay, all vaccinated calves had goodneutralizing antibody titers after the second RNA vaccinationFurthermore, the RNA vaccine elicited F-specific serum IgG titers thatwere detected in a few calves after the second vaccination and in allcalves after the third.

MF59-adjuvanted RSV-F was able to boost the IgG response in allpreviously vaccinated calves, and to boost complement-independentneutralization titers of calves previously vaccinated with RNA.

Proof of concept for RNA vaccines in large animals is particularlyimportant in light of the loss in potency observed previously withDNA-based vaccines when moving from small animal models to largeranimals and humans. A typical dose for a cow DNA vaccine would be 0.5-1mg [43, 44] and so it is very encouraging that immune responses wereinduced with only 66ps of RNA.

Effect of PEG Length

As mentioned above, liposomes were prepared using DMG to which fivedifferent PEGs were conjugated. The average molecular weight of the PEGwas 500 Da, 750 Da, 1 kDa, 2 kDa or 3 kDa.

Liposomes formed using the shortest PEGs (500 Da and 750 Da) wereunstable or aggregated during TFF purification. PEG-750 gave liposomeswith a significantly higher Zaverage diameter (669 nm) andpolydispersity index (0.21), with 77% encapsulation. The PEG-500liposomes visibly aggregated in solution during the TFF process and theexperiment was terminated. Thus these short PEG liposomes were unstable,but the longer PEGs formed stable liposomes.

The different PEG lengths (FIG. 16) had a small effect on liposomediameter and polydispersity index. The Z-average diameter was 197 nm(0.119 pdI) for the 1 kDa PEG, 142 nm (0.137 pdI) for the 2 kDa PEG, and147 nm (0.075 pdI) for the 3 kDa PEG. RNA encapsulation increasedgradually as the PEG length increased, from 81.7% to 85.9% to 91.5%(although this relationship was not always seen in subsequentexperiments).

The liposomes were administered to mice by intramuscular injection onday 0. Serum SEAP levels were measured at days 1, 3 and 6 bychemiluminescent assay. As shown in FIG. 3, the three PEG lengths wereall effective, but varying the length of the PEG had some effect onserum SEAP levels, with PEG 2000 giving the highest expression.

Different lipids and PEG Lengths

The vA317 replicon was administered in liposomes having a variety ofdifferent lipids with different PEG lengths. The liposomes all had 40%DlinDMA, 10% DSPC and 48% cholesterol, but the remaining 2% was varied,with different PEGylated lipids (e.g. FIGS. 17A to 17E) and differentPEG lengths.

Physical characteristics of the liposomes, made by method (H), were:

PEG Name PEGylated lipid length Zav (nm) pdI % encapsulat^(n) A DMG 2000136.3 0.087 85.35 B DMG 3000 120.9 0.087 72.06 C DMG 1000 175.9 0.11192.52 D FIG. 17A 2000 157.9 0.094 97.44 E FIG. 17D 2000 122.2 0.12277.84 F FIG. 17E 2000 129.8 0.125 82.57 G Cholesterol 2000 122.9 0.08787.1 H FIG. 17C 2000 138 0.137 78.48 I FIG. 17B 2000 113.4 0.091 89.12

BALB/c mice, 8 per group, were given bilateral intramuscularvaccinations (50 μL per leg) on days 0 and 21 with the replicon,. eithernaked (1 μg) or encapsulated in these liposomes (0.1 μg). Serum wascollected for antibody analysis on days 14, and 35.

F-specific serum IgG titers (GMT) were as follows, 2 weeks after the twoinjections (2wp1):

RV 2wp1 2wp2 Naked RNA 216 1356 A 3271 15659 B 3860 22378 C 1691 7412 D1025 1767 E 1618 9536 F 2684 11221 G 3514 10566 H 4142 22810 I 952 10410

The results show a trend, indicating that higher molecular weight PEGhead groups are more immunogenic. As the length of DMG-conjugated PEGincreases from 1000 Da to 3000 Da the 2wp2 F-specific IgG titersincrease from 7412 to 15659 to 22378.

Changing the linker region from ester to ether did not impact the titerssubstantially. Also, at the same molecular weight of the head group(2000) there was a trend that increasing the length of the lipid tailslowers the titers (H with C14 dialkyl vs. I with C18 dialkyl). Replacinga PEG di-alkyl lipid tail with cholesterol had little impact onimmunogenicity (A with DMG vs. G with cholesterol).

Similar experiments were performed with different lipids in which the 2kDa of PEG is split into 2x 1 kDa groups (FIG. 18, with total MW in theboxed region being 2000). The vA317 replicon was again used, with BALB/cmice, 8 per group, given bilateral intramuscular vaccinations (50 μL perleg) on days 0 & 21 with 1 μg naked RNA or 0.1 μg liposome-encapsulatedRNA. The liposomes all had 40% cationic lipid (DIinDMA), 10% DSPC and48% cholesterol, but the remaining 2% was varied, with differentPEGylated lipids (but all with 2 kDa PEG). They were made by method (H).

Physical characteristics of the liposomes were:

Name PEGylated lipid Zav (nm) pdI % encapsul^(n) A DMG 121 0.101 84.84 BSplit; R = C14 saturated 141.3 0.049 95.41 C Split; R = C16 saturated114.6 0.101 96.79 D Split; R = C18 saturated 116.5 0.088 98.63 E Split;R = C18, 1 unsaturated 129.4 0.149 93.37

Further liposomes were made with RV05. The liposomes had 40% cationiclipid (RV05) and 2% PEGylated DMG (2 kDa PEG), while the remainingcomponents varied (but cholesterol was always included). The liposomeswere made by method (H) but with pH 5. Physical characteristics were:

Name Other components Zav (nm) pdI % encapsul^(n) F 10% DSPC, 48% chol102.2 0.12 76.81 G 10% DSPC, 46% chol, 2% αGC 103.7 0.107 72.58 H 10%DPyPE, 48% chol 99.6 0.115 78.34 I 10% 18:3 PC, 48% chol 130 0.14 87.92J 10% 18:2 PC, 48% chol 101.1 0.133 76.64 K 30% 18:2 PC, 28% chol 134.30.158 57.76 αGC = α-galactosylceramide

BALB/c mice, 8 per group, were given bilateral intramuscularvaccinations (50 μL per leg) on days 0 and 21 with the replicon, eithernaked (1 μg) or encapsulated (0.1μg). Serum was collected for antibodyanalysis on days 14, and 35. F-specific serum IgG titers (GMT) were asfollows, 2 weeks after the two injections (2wp1):

RV 2wp1 2wp2 Naked RNA 321 915 A 2761 17040 B 866 3657 C 1734 5209 D 4262079 E 2696 15794 F 551 955 G 342 2531 H 1127 3881 I 364 1741 J 567 5679K 1251 5303

Splitting the PEG head groups thus lowered in vivo titers. Including adouble bond (1 degree of instauration per alkyl tail) in the PEG lipidtails increased IgG titers, 6 fold at day 14 and 7 fold at day 35. For acationic lipid with an asymmetrical lipid tails (alkyl+cholesterol),changing the neutral lipid from DSPC (saturated C18 lipid tail) to 18:2or 18:3 PC (with 2 and 3 unsaturated double bonds per tail) increasedtotal IgG titers. Comparable results were observed with replacement ofDSPC with DPyPE.

It will be understood that the invention has been described by way ofexample only and modifications may be made whilst remaining within thescope and spirit of the invention.

TABLE 1 useful phospholipids DDPC1,2-Didecanoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DEPA1,2-Dierucoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphate DEPC1,2-Erucoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DEPE1,2-Dierucoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine DEPG1,2-Dierucoyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol . . .) DLOPC1,2-Linoleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DLPA1,2-Dilauroyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphate DLPC1,2-Dilauroyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DLPE1,2-Dilauroyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine DLPG1,2-Dilauroyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol . . .) DLPS1,2-Dilauroyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylserine DMG1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine DMPA1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphate DMPC1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DMPE1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine DMPG1,2-Myristoyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol . . .) DMPS1,2-Dimyristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylserine DOPA1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphate DOPC1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DOPE1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine DOPG1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol . . .) DOPS1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylserine DPPA1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphate DPPC1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DPPE1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine DPPG1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol . . .) DPPS1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylserine DPyPE1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine DSPA1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphate DSPC1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine DSPE1,2-Diostearpyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylethanolamine DSPG1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol . . .) DSPS1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylserine EPC Egg-PC HEPCHydrogenated Egg PC HSPC High purity Hydrogenated Soy PC HSPCHydrogenated Soy PC LYSOPC 1-Myristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholineMYRISTIC LYSOPC 1-Palmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine PALMITICLYSOPC 1-Stearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine STEARIC Milk1-Myristoyl,2-palmitoyl-sn-Glycero 3-phosphatidylcholine Sphingo- myelinMPPC MSPC 1-Myristoyl,2-stearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine PMPC1-Palmitoyl,2-myristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine POPC1-Palmitoyl,2-oleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine POPE1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-Glycero-3- phosphatidylethanolamine POPG1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-Glycero-3[Phosphatidyl-rac-(1- glycerol) . . .] PSPC1-Palmitoyl,2-stearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine SMPC1-Stearoyl,2-myristoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine SOPC1-Stearoyl,2-oleoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine SPPC1-Stearoyl,2-palmitoyl-sn-Glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine

REFERENCES

-   [1] Johanning et al. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res 23:1495-1501.-   [2] Heyes et al. (2005) J Controlled Release 107:276-87.-   [3] WO2005/121348.-   [4] Liposomes: Methods and Protocols, Volume 1: Pharmaceutical    Nanocarriers: Methods and Protocols. (ed. Weissig). Humana    Press, 2009. ISBN 160327359X.-   [5] Liposome Technology, volumes I, II & III. (ed. Gregoriadis).    Informa Healthcare, 2006.-   [6] Functional Polymer Colloids and Microparticles volume 4    (Microspheres, microcapsules & liposomes). (eds. Arshady & Guyot).    Citus Books, 2002.-   [7] Jeffs et al. (2005) Pharmaceutical Research 22 (3):362-372.-   [8] WO2005/113782.-   [9] WO2011/005799.-   [10] El Ouahabi et al. (1996) FEBS Letts 380:108-12.-   [11] Giuliani et al. (2006) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(29):10834-9.-   [12] WO2009/016515.-   [13] WO02/34771.-   [14] WO2005/032582.-   [15] WO2010/119343.-   [16] WO2006/110413.-   [17] WO2005/111066.-   [18] WO2005/002619.-   [19] WO2006/138004.-   [20] WO2009/109860.-   [21] WO02/02606.-   [22] WO03/018054.-   [23] WO2006/091517.-   [24] WO2008/020330.-   [25] WO2006/089264.-   [26] WO2009/104092.-   [27] WO2009/031043.-   [28] WO2007/049155.-   [29] Gennaro (2000) Remington: The Science and Practice of Pharmacy.    20th edition, ISBN: 0683306472.-   [30] Romberg et al. (2008) Pharmaceutical Research 25:55-71.-   [31] Hoekstra et al., Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1660 (2004)    41-52-   [32] WO2009/086558-   [33] Methods In Enzymology (S. Colowick and N. Kaplan, eds.,    Academic Press, Inc.)-   [34] Handbook of Experimental Immunology, Vols. I-IV (D. M. Weir    and C. C. Blackwell, eds, 1986, Blackwell Scientific Publications)-   [35] Sambrook et al. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,    3rd edition (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press).-   [36] Handbook of Surface and Colloidal Chemistry (Birdi, K. S. ed.,    CRC Press, 1997)-   [37] Ausubel et al. (eds) (2002) Short protocols in molecular    biology, 5th edition (Current Protocols).-   [38] Molecular Biology Techniques: An Intensive Laboratory Course,    (Ream et al., eds., 1998, Academic Press)-   [39] PCR (Introduction to Biotechniques Series), 2nd ed. (Newton &    Graham eds., 1997, Springer Verlag)-   [40] Yoneyama & Fujita (2007) Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews    18:545-51.-   [41] Maurer et al. (2001) Biophysical Journal, 80: 2310-2326.-   [42] Perri et al. (2003) J Virol 77:10394-10403.-   [43] Boxus et al. (2007) J Virol 81:6879-89.-   [44] Taylor et al. (2005) Vaccine 23:1242-50.

1. A liposome within which RNA encoding an immunogen of interest isencapsulated, wherein the liposome comprises at least one lipid whichincludes a polyethylene glycol moiety, such that polyethylene glycol ispresent on the liposome's exterior, wherein the average molecular massof the polyethylene glycol is between 1 kDa and 3 kDa.
 2. The liposomeof claim 1, comprising PEG-DMG and/or a lipid of formula (X).
 3. Theliposome of claim 1, wherein the liposome has a diameter in the range of80-160 nm.
 4. The liposome of claim 1, wherein the liposome comprises alipid with a cationic head group.
 5. The liposome of claim 1, whereinthe liposome comprises a lipid with a zwitterionic head group.
 6. Theliposome of claim 1, wherein the RNA is a self-replicating RNA.
 7. Theliposome of claim 6, wherein the self-replicating RNA encodes (i) aRNA-dependent RNA polymerase which can transcribe RNA from theself-replicating RNA molecule and (ii) an immunogen.
 8. The liposome ofclaim 7, wherein the self-replicating RNA has two open reading frames,the first of which encodes an alphavirus replicase and the second ofwhich encodes the immunogen.
 9. The liposome of claim 6, wherein theself-replicating RNA is 9000-12000 nucleotides long.
 10. The liposome ofclaim 1, wherein the immunogen can elicit an immune response in vivoagainst a bacterium, a virus, a fungus or a parasite.
 11. Apharmaceutical composition comprising a liposome of claim
 1. 12. Amethod for raising a protective immune response in a vertebrate,comprising the step of administering to the vertebrate an effectiveamount of the liposome of claim
 1. 13. The liposome of claim 2, whereinthe liposome has a diameter in the range of 80-160 nm.
 14. The liposomeof claim 13, wherein the liposome comprises a lipid with a cationic headgroup.
 15. The liposome of claim 13, wherein the liposome comprises alipid with a zwitterionic head group.
 16. The liposome of claim 13,wherein the RNA is a self-replicating RNA.